Judging by the growth inside the keel box it has been missing for a while, can the boat still be sailed without it?
If he sails it like I sail mine, with keel up most of the time, I wouldn' probably notice either.
Ah, but with my Clouseau skills I deduce from '' can the boat still be sailed without it?'' he prob. hasn't sailed it.
. I'll bet the vendor knew it had gone walkies!
OP only bought the boat recently so it's a fair question.
1. If the lifting keel was only 100kg I would assume that it slotted into a stub keel which accounts for the bulk of the ballast. If that's the case then the boat will sail without the lifting keel. It may not point quite so well but it won't fall over!
2. Odds are that the keel wasn't there when he bought the boat. I'll bet the vendor knew it had gone walkies!
I have just had my boat lifted (Gib'sea 31, 1980 model) to find the lifting keel is missing,
OP only bought the boat recently so it's a fair question.
2. Odds are that the keel wasn't there when he bought the boat. I'll bet the vendor knew it had gone walkies!
If the previous owner flogged the boat sans keel, surely the surveyor would have picked it up?
While it's no good or comfort to the next owner, ( who should have insisted if he knew boats and / or engineering ) how the hell is a surveyor supposed to check a lift keel unless the boat is hoisted from a crane or in high trestles ?
While it's no good or comfort to the next owner, ( who should have insisted if he knew boats and / or engineering ) how the hell is a surveyor supposed to check a lift keel unless the boat is hoisted from a crane or in high trestles ?
He'd check it by raising it and lowering it. I think he would have a pretty good idea, if there was no weight on it.
I would not recommend galvanising a piece of plate which will sit mostly submerged in seawater, galvanising only works above water in an oxygen atmosphere. Far better blasted to SA 2 1/2 and coated in a high build zinc epoxy with epoxy glass flake topcoat