Lost containers - the most surprising thing…

Twister_Ken

Well-known member
Joined
31 May 2001
Messages
27,584
Location
'ang on a mo, I'll just take some bearings
Visit site
From the news pages

"The Maersk Svendborg lost over 500 containers after being battered by huge waves and 60-knot winds in the Bay of Biscay, about 75 miles south-west of Land's End.

Maersk, the owners of the 1138ft (347m) vessel, confirmed that 520 containers were lost but that most, around 85%, were empty. The full extent of the damage wasn't realised until the ship docked in Malaga, southern Spain, last week."

Staggering to think the crew could lose 520 containers, and not notice!

I guess we also know why prudent shipping went and anchored up in the lee of the Cherbourg peninsular, rather than playing with the waves off Ushant.
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,380
Visit site
From the new pages

"The Maersk Svendborg lost over 500 containers after being battered by huge waves and 60-knot winds in the Bay of Biscay, about 75 miles south-west of Land's End.

Maersk, the owners of the 1138ft (347m) vessel, confirmed that 520 containers were lost but that most, around 85%, were empty. The full extent of the damage wasn't realised until the ship docked in Malaga, southern Spain, last week."

Staggering to think the crew could lose 520 containers, and not notice!

I don't think it says they didn't notice but rather they didn't know it was 520 containers or what was in those that were lost.
 

chinita

Well-known member
Joined
11 Dec 2005
Messages
13,224
Location
Outer Hebrides
Visit site
I guess we also know why prudent shipping went and anchored up in the lee of the Cherbourg peninsular, rather than playing with the waves off Ushant.

Also a puzzle what they were doing out there anyway. I understand that Maersk has very sophisticated route/weather planning models to avoid this very thing.

Perhaps Minn will pop in to set us straight :)
 

OceanSprint

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2012
Messages
557
Visit site
They should make all containers have a couple of small openings, say a few inches square, with covers which disolve in seawater after, say, a days immersion. Then containers would sink after a couple of days in the sea?
 

Kelpie

Well-known member
Joined
15 May 2005
Messages
7,767
Location
Afloat
Visit site
They should make all containers have a couple of small openings, say a few inches square, with covers which disolve in seawater after, say, a days immersion. Then containers would sink after a couple of days in the sea?

Unless the containers were full of fridges.
 

Danbury

New member
Joined
17 May 2013
Messages
599
Location
Southsea
Visit site
They should make all containers have a couple of small openings, say a few inches square, with covers which disolve in seawater after, say, a days immersion. Then containers would sink after a couple of days in the sea?

They are already designed to sink if they end up over the side... it's only if the contents are exceptionally buoyant that they don't... IIRC
 
Top