Linking Wheel Pilot to Tablet

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
13,954
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
Is it really too much trouble to manually alter course in the vicinity of each waypoint?

I have never understood why I would want full A/P integration. We have it switched off. And this on a boat sailed over 95% of the time on A/P (well over 1000 nm coastal trips this year alone).
I like waypoints set a safe distance from rocky corners and (where these rare beasts exist) navigation buoys. Then depending on weather and other boats might turn sooner if weather and traffic permits. Flick off A/P, smoothly steer round, flick A/P back on, less than 5 seconds per waypoint on a voyage. Is that too involving?
 

Stemar

Well-known member
Joined
12 Sep 2001
Messages
23,693
Location
Home - Southampton, Boat - Gosport
Visit site
Thanks everyone. I rather thought that might be the case.

The idea was pure laziness on my part. In varying currents, just setting a course doesn't necessarily take me where I want to go, so I wondered if it could be made self-correcting
 

wonkywinch

Well-known member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
2,030
Location
Hamble, UK
Visit site
The AP's I'm aware of all require you to approve every change at waypoints.

Hence it is a helping hand but not much more.
My B&G Zeus S has a setting where you can "pre-approve" turns up to x degrees under autopilot. Since it's a sailing yacht, I set that very low to avoid possible autopilot induced gybes
 

Boathook

Well-known member
Joined
5 Oct 2001
Messages
8,839
Location
Surrey & boat in Dorset.
Visit site
Thanks everyone. I rather thought that might be the case.

The idea was pure laziness on my part. In varying currents, just setting a course doesn't necessarily take me where I want to go, so I wondered if it could be made self-correcting
I tried using my raymarine autohelm linked to the plotter to follow a track to a waypoint. Found it a waste of time at my speed of under 5 knots as the autohelm was working hard to follow the track due to tides and wind pushing the boat either way. Much more relaxing to set a compass course and occasionally tweak, especially to avoid pot markers !
Following a track at high speed would make more sense imho.
 

B27

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jul 2023
Messages
2,068
Visit site
Is it really too much trouble to manually alter course in the vicinity of each waypoint?

I have never understood why I would want full A/P integration. We have it switched off. And this on a boat sailed over 95% of the time on A/P (well over 1000 nm coastal trips this year alone).
I like waypoints set a safe distance from rocky corners and (where these rare beasts exist) navigation buoys. Then depending on weather and other boats might turn sooner if weather and traffic permits. Flick off A/P, smoothly steer round, flick A/P back on, less than 5 seconds per waypoint on a voyage. Is that too involving?
I agree.
Around here, most of the 'corners' are rich in pot markers, so there's a fair bit of manual intervention anyway.
Although our tillerpilot doesn't 'flick off' with the push of a switch so it's sometimes easier to just poke the +10 or -10 buttons.

If we are sailing, we don't head to waypoints, we look for good speed in the general direction.
It would be different in more constrained waters.
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
13,954
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
My B&G Zeus S has a setting where you can "pre-approve" turns up to x degrees under autopilot. Since it's a sailing yacht, I set that very low to avoid possible autopilot induced gybes
So what happens if the “pre-approved” turn happens with other boats close by? Or pot buoys?
I am happy to use a route on the plotter, but is it really too difficult to take a few seconds to manually check and alter the course on the A/P.
 
Top