aknight
Well-Known Member
Ran a search but couldn't see that this has been picked up (someone please correct me if I'm wrong).
The May copy of YM (?) had a small item suggesting that LED nav lights might invalidate your insurance policy, although reading it carefully I couldn't actually make out what the justification for that was. They quoted an insurance man as saying something along the lines of "Um, well, they might but then again they might not..."
I am installing LED nav lights as part of Arabella's refit, and that decision is based partly on a number of factors:
1. my understanding that I will achieve a reduction in power consumption compared to conventional bulbs (a thorny issue with a boat as small as mine, where I want more capacity released to power nav instruments/autopilot).
2. LED's don't appear to 'blow' in the way that conventional bulbs do.
3. (more controversial possibly?) I thought that, assuming you bought the appropriate model of course, you stood at least as good, if not better, chance of being seen as with conventional nav lights.
With factors 1 and 2 in particular, I thought I'd done the sensible thing and increased the chances of having functioning nav lights (power for longer + less chance of failure), but maybe I haven't?
Aqua Signal and Hella Marine, both well-known brands, now have models out (at the moment I have had Hella LEDs fitted to the pushpit and pulpit and am considering the - cheaper - Aqua Signal tri for the masthead).
I don't have any technical contribution to make at all to this debate. Just curious as to whether I've made the wrong call, whether from the insurance point of view or from the perspective of the reasoning outlined above.
The May copy of YM (?) had a small item suggesting that LED nav lights might invalidate your insurance policy, although reading it carefully I couldn't actually make out what the justification for that was. They quoted an insurance man as saying something along the lines of "Um, well, they might but then again they might not..."
I am installing LED nav lights as part of Arabella's refit, and that decision is based partly on a number of factors:
1. my understanding that I will achieve a reduction in power consumption compared to conventional bulbs (a thorny issue with a boat as small as mine, where I want more capacity released to power nav instruments/autopilot).
2. LED's don't appear to 'blow' in the way that conventional bulbs do.
3. (more controversial possibly?) I thought that, assuming you bought the appropriate model of course, you stood at least as good, if not better, chance of being seen as with conventional nav lights.
With factors 1 and 2 in particular, I thought I'd done the sensible thing and increased the chances of having functioning nav lights (power for longer + less chance of failure), but maybe I haven't?
Aqua Signal and Hella Marine, both well-known brands, now have models out (at the moment I have had Hella LEDs fitted to the pushpit and pulpit and am considering the - cheaper - Aqua Signal tri for the masthead).
I don't have any technical contribution to make at all to this debate. Just curious as to whether I've made the wrong call, whether from the insurance point of view or from the perspective of the reasoning outlined above.