It takes all sorts

Peppermint

New member
Joined
11 Oct 2002
Messages
2,919
Location
Home in Chilterns, Boat in Southampton, Another bo
Visit site
At a hearing at Horse Ferry Road Magistrates Court the owner/skipper of a 45ft yacht, called ‘Scintilla’, was found guilty on five charges arising from two voyages; two for not having the appropriate Certificate of Competence to take charge of the yacht; two for not having Load Line Certification for the yacht, and one for breaching a Prohibition Notice. The charges were brought by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, an Executive Agency of the Department for Transport, following complaints received in relation to the illegitimate charter operation.

Mr Francois Haussauer, aged 52, had been commercially operating his home built yacht in the South of France for a niche naturist market. He promoted the charter holiday to the British public via the internet, a Channel 5 film and publicity brochures. He offered `Scintilla’ on a skippered charter basis and took paying passengers to sea without the required certification of a charter vessel.

The safety regulations that cover such craft are contained in the MCA Code of Practice known as the Blue Code, and are intended to protect the public by ensuring, amongst other things, that the correct safety equipment, watertight integrity and stability and crew competence is in place.

The court heard how Mr Haussauer failed to comply with the regulations even after numerous attempts by the MCA to educate and inform him of the requirements. `Scintilla’ was chartered with intent despite Mr Haussauer’s knowledge that it would violate the safety regulations.

Upon sentencing the District Judge told the court that he did not believe Mr Haussauer’s attempt to pass off paying customers as “friends”. Before sentencing he said, “This was a commercial enterprise and the statutory exemptions do not apply.”

Mr Haussauer was fined a total of £4,500 and costs were awarded to the MCA.

Claude Hamilton, Head of Code Vessel Safety Branch for the MCA said: “Fare-paying passengers on a British ship have the right to expect high safety standards and it is our duty to prevent sub-standard and illegal operations. The MCA does not issue prohibition notices without good cause and all violations are investigated.”

from BYM news.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Romeo

Well-known member
Joined
14 Aug 2002
Messages
5,033
Location
Forth
Visit site
Pretty steep fine, but I guess they couldn't take the shirt off his back.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

ParaHandy

Active member
Joined
18 Nov 2001
Messages
5,210
Visit site
... one critical detail is missing: the charter was to nudists .. which, of course, had nothing to do with the alacrity with which Capt Bligh's (CEO MCA) men leapt on board ....

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Twister_Ken

Well-known member
Joined
31 May 2001
Messages
27,584
Location
'ang on a mo, I'll just take some bearings
Visit site
Lucky escape

Wants to think himself fortunate - instead of the Horseferry Road Magistrates Court it could have beeen the anchor winch which extracted punishment!

<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.writeforweb.com/twister1>Let's Twist Again</A>
 

Sybarite

Well-known member
Joined
7 Dec 2002
Messages
27,681
Location
France
Visit site
In addition to what the others have already said, this is an interesting question of territoriality. Here was a business being operated ( ie the execution of the offer) in France. French rules are even more strict than British ones about any commercial sailing venture. All the big names in ocean racing had to suffer the indignity of sitting their exams when the new rules were brought in a few years ago.

Theoretically the French could also prosecute this person for the same reasons...

John

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Romeo

Well-known member
Joined
14 Aug 2002
Messages
5,033
Location
Forth
Visit site
Re: Lucky escape

re "....it could have beeen the anchor winch which extracted punishment! ":
Who needs a winch when you have a tackle on deck.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top