I was astonished...

KenMcCulloch

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 Apr 2007
Messages
2,786
Location
Edinburgh, Scotland
Visit site
... by what I found when I came to dismantle the engine water intake. There was a nice bronze combined seacock and water strainer with a big flange bolted to a plank, and a grille on the outside. I had it on the list of things to look at this refit, particularly because of my suspicions about the dodgy looking hose tail fitting screwed in the side of the strainer. I was right to be suspicious as it turned out to be one of those soft iron pipefittings.

Unscrewing said crumbly iron thing left some bits of rusty iron in the threaded hole so I decided to see if I could persuade the whole thing to come off to allow better access to said hole to clear out the remains. A slightly tedious quarter of an hour of spannering and the thing came free, to reveal....













.. a 1" hole in the midddle of the plank. No actual skinfitting as we know them, Jim, just an 'ole. The strainer flange was well sealed to the plank and the bolts through from the outside likewise, and most interestingly the timber appears perfectly sound.

From my knowledge of the boat's history a Stuart-Turner petrol engine was installed some time in the 1960s and the water intake looks as though it dates from then. The sides of the hole had been coated in sealant (which had unstuck and been mostly sucked into the bottom of the strainer) and the bolt heads covered by the grate screwed on outside. Does anyone know if this was a usual sort of fitment?

It certainly won't be being replaced; a nice new bronze through hull and various new plumbing will be installed in January once the old bolts are out and the holes well plugged. I'm just a bit worried that with the vastly improved water supply the engine will never actually reach operating temp /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif. The various restrictions in the flow that all this has revealed leaves me wondering how any water at all managed to get through.
 
As long as the pump is working sufficiently to keep the water jacket full of water, the engine won't need much more than that. A diesel thrives on heat, and just under boiling point of water is probably ideal. There should be a thermostat somwhere in the system to prevent too much water from over-cooling the engine, just as you have in your car.
Peter.
 
Sounds like a standard ST inlet. Should, if I remember have a bronze spigot to go through the hole the same as a Blakes seacock.

If you are replacing with a modern bronze ball valve, you will need one to take a 1/2 inch hose which is what the Yanmar needs. You can have a larger ball valve if it fills the existing hole in the hull with a reducer tail. Suggest you fit a remote water strainer from Vetus - see their catalogue.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Sounds like a standard ST inlet. Should, if I remember have a bronze spigot to go through the hole the same as a Blakes seacock.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I was expecting to find but not in this case. The new plan does indeed include a remote strainer as well as improved access to the plumbing.
 
Top