Fuel Consumption

boatmike

boatmike

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 Jun 2002
Messages
7,053
Location
Solent
Visit site
OK folks I know this has been discussed before but can't find it. Aquastar 33 has 2 TMD 41a 150HP engines. at WOT she achieves 16 knots (semi -displacement) at about 3600 RPM. What fuel consumption should I expect ?
 
I get 60 litres per hour at 23 knots , 2x170hp
33ft planing hull boat .
Semi displacement hull uses more fuel I guess.
 
Thanks both, Yes Martyn I think that's right. The difference is that you will probably achieve 23 knots for your 60 litres while I will get 15/16. I would rather be in mine doing 8 knots in a F7/8 than yours though! Horses for courses I guess. The reason I have asked is that I am over propped at the moment and when that's corrected I expect to achieve about 16. Interestingly at 8/10 knots currently I burn about 28/30 litres/hour but that's little more than hull speed so requires very little HP
 
boatmike said:
OK folks I know this has been discussed before but can't find it. Aquastar 33 has 2 TMD 41a 150HP engines. at WOT she achieves 16 knots (semi -displacement) at about 3600 RPM. What fuel consumption should I expect ?
Click to expand...
72 litres per hour from tests I did many years ago.
Sorry just noticed 41 series engines I quoted 31 150hp
 
boatmike said:
Yes Martyn I think that's right. The difference is that you will probably achieve 23 knots for your 60 litres while I will get 15/16. I would rather be in mine doing 8 knots in a F7/8 than yours though! Horses for courses I guess.
Click to expand...
I admit to aiming for relatively calm sea conditions.
 
I cant see speed having any affect on fuel consumption at WOT. Is that simply not a function of how much the fuel pump can throw in in these analogue engines?
 
BruceK said:
I cant see speed having any affect on fuel consumption at WOT. Is that simply not a function of how much the fuel pump can throw in in these analogue engines?
Click to expand...

Speed of the boat is a function of the propeller curve, the fuel burn is a function of prop curve, so the two things are linked.
 
I'll take your word on it, but I struggle to see it. I've burnt the same amount of fuel per hour going slow at WOT in rough head seas as I do when fully on the plane and skipping along in calm seas.
 
Bruce, I think you are over thinking a simple statement. Of course it is throttle opening that determines fuel consumption but a planing hull in good conditions will go faster than a semi-displacement in good conditions using the same power. No contest. I think Bens talk of prop curve (I think he means pitch) is a red herring because overpitched as I am now I don't get max RPM and underpitched I would get the RPM but not use the power. I think we can only assume optimal prop dia and pitch and compare fuel consumed at WOT which should be pretty similar for similar HP. All we were saying is that not all boats will achieve the same speed for HP consumed so you are right that it is HP at WOT that determines consumption not speed. The choice of prop determines how efficiently we convert power available to vessel speed.
 
boatmike said:
Bruce, I think you are over thinking a simple statement. Of course it is throttle opening that determines fuel consumption but a planing hull in good conditions will go faster than a semi-displacement in good conditions using the same power. No contest. I think Bens talk of prop curve (I think he means pitch) is a red herring because overpitched as I am now I don't get max RPM and underpitched I would get the RPM but not use the power. I think we can only assume optimal prop dia and pitch and compare fuel consumed at WOT which should be pretty similar for similar HP. All we were saying is that not all boats will achieve the same speed for HP consumed so you are right that it is HP at WOT that determines consumption not speed. The choice of prop determines how efficiently we convert power available to vessel speed.
Click to expand...
Prop curve refers to a graph that gives an indication of a notional power against speed through water and does not have any relation
The prop curve assumes correct pitch and diameter
A propeller absorbes the same power when turned at the same speed regardless of the power available and cannot Turn any faster than the torque available will allow similar to going up a hill in high gear restricts your speed
 
boatmike said:
Bruce, I think you are over thinking a simple statement. Of course it is throttle opening that determines fuel consumption but a planing hull in good conditions will go faster than a semi-displacement in good conditions using the same power. No contest. I think Bens talk of prop curve (I think he means pitch) is a red herring because overpitched as I am now I don't get max RPM and underpitched I would get the RPM but not use the power. I think we can only assume optimal prop dia and pitch and compare fuel consumed at WOT which should be pretty similar for similar HP. All we were saying is that not all boats will achieve the same speed for HP consumed so you are right that it is HP at WOT that determines consumption not speed. The choice of prop determines how efficiently we convert power available to vessel speed.
Click to expand...

OK. What I was alluding to is a TMD 41a 150HP will have the same fuel consumption at WOT and whether on a planing hull or SD hull will make not one jot of difference as both will be developing 150 ponies and for that engine to deliver it it needs fuel. The same amount of fuel. (props being good for the boat and engines just attaining max rpm).
 
BruceK said:
OK. What I was alluding to is a TMD 41a 150HP will have the same fuel consumption at WOT and whether on a planing hull or SD hull will make not one jot of difference as both will be developing 150 ponies and for that engine to deliver it it needs fuel. The same amount of fuel. (props being good for the boat and engines just attaining max rpm).
[/QUOTE

I agree with Bruce they will both use the same amount fuel per hour ,but the planning boat will get to the destination faster so it will be running for less time Therefore using less fuel ,?
Click to expand...
 
A diesel doesn't have a throttle, you set desired engine speed with the lever and the governor alters the fuel supply to maintain the selected speed. That means the fuel consumption can vary significantly for the same rpm. For a given power demand though the source of the load doesn't matter, the fuel consumption will be basically the same.
 
This all makes I smile. I asked a very simple question that was answered (I think quite correctly) in the first reply. All the other posts have been written by Fred Drift...... Good 'ere innit????
 
Well actually your question was ambiguous because you added a whole lot of irrelevancies that clouded the question.
 
boatmike said:
Bruce, I think you are over thinking a simple statement. Of course it is throttle opening that determines fuel consumption but a planing hull in good conditions will go faster than a semi-displacement in good conditions using the same power. No contest. I think Bens talk of prop curve (I think he means pitch) is a red herring because overpitched as I am now I don't get max RPM and underpitched I would get the RPM but not use the power. I think we can only assume optimal prop dia and pitch and compare fuel consumed at WOT which should be pretty similar for similar HP. All we were saying is that not all boats will achieve the same speed for HP consumed so you are right that it is HP at WOT that determines consumption not speed. The choice of prop determines how efficiently we convert power available to vessel speed.
Click to expand...

Bruce overthinking??? I know someone who wont forget that one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Other threads that may be of interest

K
Alternator and fuel pump Volvo Penta 3.0 GLP-D
Replies
2
Views
197
Kwanza
K

Share this page

Top