Last digit looks like a 5 to me.5 digits, can't make them out. maybe 500lb?? will have a look next time i am passing (Arrochar)
I think that's a Westerly Jouster keel? Am I right?like i said, i know the owner...
Still trying to find out from the owner's son. The hull is further along the beach...I think that's a Westerly Jouster keel? Am I right?
500lb perhaps?50015
Oops. What happened?Still trying to find out from the owner's son. The hull is further along the beach...
Came off the mooring. She is/was a Westerly JousterOops. What happened?
Well spotted.I think that's a Westerly Jouster keel? Am I right?
No (serious) offence intended to the owner, I look forward to you posting that it's found a good home.like i said, i know the owner...
Came off the mooring. She is/was a Westerly Jouster
I had a fixed keel Jouster. That fixing plate with sixteen whole nuts and sixteen half nuts is quite distinctive. As is the absurdly thin layup at the mounting - on mine I increased the thickness from 1/4" to 1", with five tapered stainless keels as reinforcement.Well spotted.![]()
Cheers. The thinness of the hull at attachment point looks very thinI had a fixed keel Jouster. That fixing plate with sixteen whole nuts and sixteen half nuts is quite distinctive. As is the absurdly thin layup at the mounting - on mine I increased the thickness from 1/4" to 1", with five tapered stainless keels as reinforcement.
Commiserations to the owner, bikedaft.
It's a dreadful piece of design. The flange sits in a shallow recess on the bottom of the hull, so it all fairs in very nicely, but there is effectively no significant thickening of the layup there, and horrible stress concentrations. The Jouster is a lovely boat, but I would always recommend reinforcing the hull.Cheers. The thinness of the hull at attachment point looks very thin