Flags at Half Mast - UNESCO Commemoration of the First World War Centenary

Baddox

Well-known member
Joined
1 Mar 2010
Messages
1,377
Location
Sunny Northumberland
Visit site
This should be of interest to anyone out on the 28th.

From https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/320975/475_WWI_UNESCO.pdf

"Notice to all Ship Owners, Ship Operators, Terminal Operators, Port Authorities, Classification Societies, Agents, Charterers, Shippers, Consignors, Training Providers, Masters, Officers and crews of Merchant Ships This MIN expires 29
June 2014

Summary
On 28 June 2014, vessels at sea are requested to fly flags and ensigns at half - mast and vessels in harbours are encouraged to sound a signal at a designated time of 1700 h UTC"..........
 

MASH

N/A
Joined
8 Mar 2004
Messages
2,188
Visit site
As an addendum to this could I please ask those with shore-based flagstaffs who are minded to do likewise to ensure they know the correct manner of raising a flag to half mast?

i.e. it does NOT I repeat DOES NOT mean halfway up the mast!!! As eny fule no.

Regrettably we will doubtless see some horrendously inappropriate and frankly insulting flag hoists in the months to come due to an extraordinarily widespread ignorance of the correct procedure.
Please, take the trouble to find out before making an embarrassing hash of a half mast hoist and insulting those you mean to honour!
 
Last edited:
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
525
Location
Canberra
Visit site
But why don't you just tell them, if it's of concern? You hoist the flag to the masthead, then lower it by the flag's-width-and-a-whisker, the space left being to allow an imaginary 'flag of death' to fly above it.

This is correct --

Flag_at_Half-Staff_only.jpg

but neither of these is --

kitty-hawk-half-staffed-flag.jpg
halfstaff.jpg
Mike
 

Iain C

Active member
Joined
20 Oct 2009
Messages
2,367
Visit site
As an addendum to this could I please ask those with shore-based flagstaffs who are minded to do likewise to ensure they know the correct manner of raising a flag to half mast?

i.e. it does NOT I repeat DOES NOT mean halfway up the mast!!! As eny fule no.

Regrettably we will doubtless see some horrendously inappropriate and frankly insulting flag hoists in the months to come due to an extraordinarily widespread ignorance of the correct procedure.
Please, take the trouble to find out before making an embarrassing hash of a half mast hoist and insulting those you mean to honour!

What a bizarre post!
 

Coaster

Active member
Joined
1 Jul 2009
Messages
1,978
Location
home Warwickshire / boat Pembrokeshire
Visit site
What a bizarre post!

The MASH post seems to be a form of boasting. It's saying 'how clever I am, knowing what half mast means, and I'm so much better than the ignorant hoi polloi'.

Well meaning attempts to honour the dead, whether or not they adhere to arbitrary rules, are generally to be admired not despised.

I'd like MASH to apologise.
 

chinita

Well-known member
Joined
11 Dec 2005
Messages
13,224
Location
Outer Hebrides
Visit site
But why don't you just tell them, if it's of concern? You hoist the flag to the masthead, then lower it by the flag's-width-and-a-whisker, the space left being to allow an imaginary 'flag of death' to fly above it.

This is correct --

Flag_at_Half-Staff_only.jpg

but neither of these is --

kitty-hawk-half-staffed-flag.jpg
halfstaff.jpg
Mike

Sorry to appear pedantic old Oz cousin but I think the correct terminology is the flag 'hoist'. The 'hoist' being the vertical length of the flag (and a whisker) which the flag should be lowered to represent the 'half mast' position.
 

WilliamUK

New member
Joined
16 Dec 2006
Messages
314
Location
Manchester, UK
Visit site
Some people are too easily offended.
The flag isn't important. It doesn't actually matter if someone doesn't go through some daft military procedure when hoisting and finding it offensive should be a bit embarrassing.
 

jerrytug

N/A
Joined
31 May 2006
Messages
3,775
Location
Lorient
Visit site
As an addendum to this could I please ask those with shore-based flagstaffs who are minded to do likewise to ensure they know the correct manner of raising a flag to half mast?

i.e. it does NOT I repeat DOES NOT mean halfway up the mast!!! As eny fule no.

Regrettably we will doubtless see some horrendously inappropriate and frankly insulting flag hoists in the months to come due to an extraordinarily widespread ignorance of the correct procedure.
Please, take the trouble to find out before making an embarrassing hash of a half mast hoist and insulting those you mean to honour!

Ha ha, you nearly had me for a minute, excellent p!sstake ;)
 

chinita

Well-known member
Joined
11 Dec 2005
Messages
13,224
Location
Outer Hebrides
Visit site
Some people are too easily offended.
The flag isn't important. It doesn't actually matter if someone doesn't go through some daft military procedure when hoisting and finding it offensive should be a bit embarrassing.

There are military procedures, but there are not any daft military procedures.
 

pvb

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
45,603
Location
UK East Coast
Visit site
OK, I understand that this may be interpreted as controversial, but I'm an OAP and I really think that it's time to move on. The First World War was a tragedy, not really something to celebrate or commemorate. UNESCO may have requested this, but their remit is unclear. I think the request should be ignored.
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
Regrettably we will doubtless see some horrendously inappropriate and frankly insulting flag hoists in the months to come due to an extraordinarily widespread ignorance of the correct procedure.

What do you find insulting about a flag not quite high enough up the mast for your taste? Why should I find it insulting?
 
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
525
Location
Canberra
Visit site
Sorry to appear pedantic old Oz cousin but I think the correct terminology is the flag 'hoist'. The 'hoist' being the vertical length of the flag (and a whisker) which the flag should be lowered to represent the 'half mast' position.

Ah. As one pedant to another, we both know you're not really sorry at all, me old Pommy china. But I was actually writing for those benighted heathens who MASH was talking about -- oops, sorry, about whom MASH was speaking. But to be pedantic a whisker longer, if a thing is vertical then one should really be speaking of its height rather than its length. Also, your second sentence would be grammatically correct only if you were to replace the word "being" with "is", and inserted the word "to" before "which".... :)

Mike
 

chinita

Well-known member
Joined
11 Dec 2005
Messages
13,224
Location
Outer Hebrides
Visit site
Ah. As one pedant to another, we both know you're not really sorry at all, me old Pommy china. But I was actually writing for those benighted heathens who MASH was talking about -- oops, sorry, about whom MASH was speaking. But to be pedantic a whisker longer, if a thing is vertical then one should really be speaking of its height rather than its length. Also, your second sentence would be grammatically correct only if you were to replace the word "being" with "is", and inserted the word "to" before "which".... :)

Mike

'Benighted'. Wonderful word. I must use it more often; thanks.
 
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
525
Location
Canberra
Visit site
Ah. Well, it is -- and especially when we're talking about northern hemisphericals, of course.... :D

But enough of this banter -- I think it's time to get back to the topic.

(What is the topic, by the way?)

Mike
 

Seajet

...
Joined
23 Sep 2010
Messages
29,177
Location
West Sussex / Hants
Visit site
So, a mention of respect for people who gave their all so that we could live in peace and freedom and have forums like this, degenerates into arguing about who's the best smart-arse with flags; I hope those who died for us are grinning wryly as they look down, this is what you fought for guys, and thankyou !
 
Top