Ships Woofey, This could end up as a political debate?? One of the great delights of sailing is to see the wildlife, for my family, the dolphine family are the tops. Its a pity that they dont bring in the legislation ASAP.
Well spotted
Tom
<hr width=100% size=1>
I wish I'd been born rich instead of good looking ?
Yes, this a double blow. Both the mammals and the fish are under threat.
Pair trawlers take a sizeable proportion of the bass breeding stocks. I thought that for once we were going to act before the species had been driven close to extinction. I hope that the UK govt. are going to appeal.
The EC are obviously right in this matter. I am sure that careful monitoring of the situation will see a year on year decline in the number of cetaceans being trapped in pair fishing nets.
<hr width=100% size=1>Think I'll draw some little rabbits on my head, from a distance they might be mistaken for hairs.
Ships Woofey, This could end up as a political debate??
<hr></blockquote>
and then
<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>
We would all be on the moral high ground for successfully protecting the dolphins. Might we then be in a better position to save red diesel?
<hr></blockquote>
yup you’re right, I just wanted to bring some attention to a very sad decision, not start up an old fight. Ah well, show’s how wrong a pup can be /forums/images/icons/frown.gif
Why does everyone assume that the EC has rejected a well argued and documented case? Is it impossible that the UK govt has made a cock of it? Or that the case is indeed weak?
If you listen to the "special pleading " groups, there is barely a species that isnt in danger of becoming extinct . And even when they are not - like whales - they still need to be protected. Havent they ever heard of crying wolf?
Personally, I reckon we should save the sea bass and eat environmentalists instead!
Harumph!
<hr width=100% size=1>this post is a personal opinion, and you should not base your actions on it.
Come on, you're obviously no EU lover, and would equally happily say, "The EU has stopped our hardworking fishermen from making a living", if the EU had allowed the ban. If the Commission had said they couldn't make a ruling as it lay within national jurisdiction, then would you say that the EU were acting spineless - again!
Fishing is surely one of areas where it's sensible to have international rules and allowing all participating nations to enforce them.
Not so much not wanting to upset the French and Spanish, as knowing they wouldnt take any notice of it anyway, and any attempt at enforcement would cause mayhem, as anyone caught up in the blockades of recent years will know.