It's BBC2! BBC1 is Hustle.
I enjoyed it too despite the standard rigging but I couldn't help thinking that you could probably have built a replica for less and then we'd be able to go sailing on it. I'd pay a few quid for that.
8 x 4 sheets of ply glued down for the weather deck
I enjoyed it too despite the standard rigging but I couldn't help thinking that you could probably have built a replica for less and then we'd be able to go sailing on it. I'd pay a few quid for that.
3 layers too- but the finish is 18 mm teak boards, with modern Sikaflex or similar caulking.
They should not have done that - they should have relaid the decks authentically. They used plywood under decking in the 50's and it rotted. My own boat still has her 30's real teack decks. Poor show.
I wonder if they will now put the hatch wedges in the right way round?
it might have been done to add stiffening to the deck due ti hoiking her up 10`in the air
They should not have done that - they should have relaid the decks authentically. They used plywood under decking in the 50's and it rotted. My own boat still has her 30's real teak decks. Poor show.
.
I thought they said that the decks were not original anyway, they had already been replaced and so they were not that bothered by the damage they sustained in the fire, presumably composite layers with the glue/resin they used will have less tendency to leak long term.
Such is not, in fact, the case. Please either trust me on that or spend a few hours reading the deck construction threads over at the Woodenboat forum. The type of deck that they have gone for is the most likely of all constructions to leak. I've only got forty years of wooden boat ownership behind me so I may be wrong but I don't think so.
18mm of wood is too thick to conform to the stable ply subdeck so it will move as the moisture content varies; this will inevitably destroy the bond to the subdeck. It may take thirty years, but it will happen. Once it happens, moisture will accumulate in the ply subdeck and the subdeck will rot.
My other objection given that the Cutty Sark people have wittered on about "originality" is that not only have they come up with a bad deck, they have come up with a fake one.
I thought that it was quite an informative and interesting programme within its hour slot. It was a pity that it wasn't in HD as that would have been worthwhile, even if it wouldn't have helped the lovely old photos shown.
A replica just isn't the same thing. I have been on the Cutty Sark as well as other historic vessels and always found them interesting but I was bored within a few minutes of going on the Batavia at Lelystad. I'm not especially sentimental about the Cutty Sark but believe she is worth preserving for her symbolic value alone. £50 million sounds rather a lot though.