viago
Active member
i was chatting to my boy who had flown to brisbane from perth to do his exams and practical to get regitsered as a sparky in oz.
having done that ve visited the maritime museum there and was very impressed.
he told me about this 16 yo lass whe circumnavigeted non stop. they had her boat.
i've no idea how i know nothing about her but she smashed records.
anyway, we got chatting and i suggested that it would be great for oz to have a perfect working replica of cook's ship. i was pretty sure the plans must exist stil.
he agreed with me adding reveue streams i hadn't thought of. i'm no slouch in that department myself.
anyway, i looked it up on wiki and i fould the construction very interesting considerind her achievements.
it was flat bottommed to take the ground for repairs and for decent cartography.
HMS Endeavour - Wikipedia
it certainly makes interesting reading.
what really interested me was the debate about the height of her masts.
it seems the were shorter than naval standard and modern thinking suggests that's wrong nd they would have been naval standard.
i'm no naval architect but i think that seeing as she was flat bottomed the masts would certainly have had to be shorter.
i'd very much like to hear what other more knowledgeable forumites think on this matter.
i'm pretty sure leo of 'tally ho' fame has all the contacts needed to rebuild endeavor.
having done that ve visited the maritime museum there and was very impressed.
he told me about this 16 yo lass whe circumnavigeted non stop. they had her boat.

i've no idea how i know nothing about her but she smashed records.
anyway, we got chatting and i suggested that it would be great for oz to have a perfect working replica of cook's ship. i was pretty sure the plans must exist stil.
he agreed with me adding reveue streams i hadn't thought of. i'm no slouch in that department myself.
anyway, i looked it up on wiki and i fould the construction very interesting considerind her achievements.
it was flat bottommed to take the ground for repairs and for decent cartography.
HMS Endeavour - Wikipedia
it certainly makes interesting reading.
what really interested me was the debate about the height of her masts.
it seems the were shorter than naval standard and modern thinking suggests that's wrong nd they would have been naval standard.
i'm no naval architect but i think that seeing as she was flat bottomed the masts would certainly have had to be shorter.
i'd very much like to hear what other more knowledgeable forumites think on this matter.
i'm pretty sure leo of 'tally ho' fame has all the contacts needed to rebuild endeavor.