Twister_Ken
Well-known member
Just reached the point in "Sailing the Pacific" where our hero falls off.
Conditions, nighttime, running downwind, boat overpowered in a tradewind squall. Woken by graunchy noises he comes on deck groggy wearing only boxer shorts, sees what's going on, puts on harness and then jacket over harness, lets go genny sheet to furl, but it jams in fairlead. Goes forward to free it and next thing he knows he is being towed along underwater. Heck of a struggle to get his head clear to breath. Does so then finds he cannot pull himself up to deck level (only about 3 feet on a Twister) against the force of water. Each time he tries he fails and is getting weaker. Realises that water filling his jacket is major factor in force of water acting on him. Manages to roll on back, and unzip top half of his jacket, but bottom half of zip is scrunched up around harness and is jammed. manages to tear zip out of jacket and it is dragged down over his legs and away. He then catches gunwhale and waits for the boat to roll to windward, which scoops him far enough out of water that he can scramble back aboard, now starkers (boxers have disappeared somewhere astern).
Makes you question:
a) wisdom of wearing harness over jacket (he'd never have got jacket off)
b) wisdom of jackets with built-in harness (ditto)
c) wisdom of going forward on leeward side (Twister is small enough that if he gone up on windward side, and come around the front of the mast, he'd probably have been able to reach the fairlead with no slack in his tether. Failing that, he could have hooked on to one of the points on the mast.
So, do shorthanded sailors need to rethink the way they wear a harness?
Conditions, nighttime, running downwind, boat overpowered in a tradewind squall. Woken by graunchy noises he comes on deck groggy wearing only boxer shorts, sees what's going on, puts on harness and then jacket over harness, lets go genny sheet to furl, but it jams in fairlead. Goes forward to free it and next thing he knows he is being towed along underwater. Heck of a struggle to get his head clear to breath. Does so then finds he cannot pull himself up to deck level (only about 3 feet on a Twister) against the force of water. Each time he tries he fails and is getting weaker. Realises that water filling his jacket is major factor in force of water acting on him. Manages to roll on back, and unzip top half of his jacket, but bottom half of zip is scrunched up around harness and is jammed. manages to tear zip out of jacket and it is dragged down over his legs and away. He then catches gunwhale and waits for the boat to roll to windward, which scoops him far enough out of water that he can scramble back aboard, now starkers (boxers have disappeared somewhere astern).
Makes you question:
a) wisdom of wearing harness over jacket (he'd never have got jacket off)
b) wisdom of jackets with built-in harness (ditto)
c) wisdom of going forward on leeward side (Twister is small enough that if he gone up on windward side, and come around the front of the mast, he'd probably have been able to reach the fairlead with no slack in his tether. Failing that, he could have hooked on to one of the points on the mast.
So, do shorthanded sailors need to rethink the way they wear a harness?