Colvic Seaworker 22.

Stavros

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 Jul 2017
Messages
134
Location
Northwest of an island.
Visit site
Has anyone any knowledge of the Colvic seaworker 22.
I am aware that various engines were fitted, i am not interested in the outdrive version or the smaller engines, but mainly in the 80hp Ford engine, i presume this engine is the 4 litre tractor engine.
The boat will be used for fishing and at a pinch longer trips with an overnighter included. I know that this is a small boat but I would be interested in the opinions of anyone that had been out in one as to the sea keeping qualities. thanks.
 
Brilliant boats.
Later versions were semi displacement and capable of some reasonable speeds (after 1986 possibly?) if given enough power.
The earlier 4 cylinder 2.5l ford units will just give hull speed, but a very reassuring ride.
Heavy boats for their size, with a thick layup, very capable sea boats IMHO.
The engines are noisy, but not as bad as the BMC units and are perfectly acceptable with a bit of insulation in the engine box and keeping the revs down (which you'd do in a displacement hull anyway)
 
Has anyone any knowledge of the Colvic seaworker 22.
I am aware that various engines were fitted, i am not interested in the outdrive version or the smaller engines, but mainly in the 80hp Ford engine, i presume this engine is the 4 litre tractor engine.
The boat will be used for fishing and at a pinch longer trips with an overnighter included. I know that this is a small boat but I would be interested in the opinions of anyone that had been out in one as to the sea keeping qualities. thanks.

If you want the best 22ft fishing/ angling/ overnight plus longer trip boat. That might be a few quid dearer than a Colvic Seaworker 22
Look at the Channel Island 22
I have had both
The Channel Island is a much better sea boat
I had the 140 turbo, 19 kts max cruised at 12 through seas some 35 footers would gib at. The Colvic would not
Loads more Colvics about and as Chris_d said, loads were home fit (as lots of Colvics were) so more about and probably cheaper than a Channel Island. but all the Channel Islands were 'factory fit' and built to a standard of fit out. well, except for the first 6 but that is another Story!
 
Brilliant boats.
Later versions were semi displacement and capable of some reasonable speeds (after 1986 possibly?) if given enough power.
The earlier 4 cylinder 2.5l ford units will just give hull speed, but a very reassuring ride.
Heavy boats for their size, with a thick layup, very capable sea boats IMHO.
The engines are noisy, but not as bad as the BMC units and are perfectly acceptable with a bit of insulation in the engine box and keeping the revs down (which you'd do in a displacement hull anyway)

I believe some of the earlier ones had the 2.5 ford tranny engine as you say, but the later SD hulls had the Sabre 80hp 4 litre lump, I have seen reports of the Tranny engine with a turbo getting 130hp. for me, the engine is more important than the state of the boat, i don't mind a winter project.
 
If you want the best 22ft fishing/ angling/ overnight plus longer trip boat. That might be a few quid dearer than a Colvic Seaworker 22
Look at the Channel Island 22
I have had both
The Channel Island is a much better sea boat
I had the 140 turbo, 19 kts max cruised at 12 through seas some 35 footers would gib at. The Colvic would not
Loads more Colvics about and as Chris_d said, loads were home fit (as lots of Colvics were) so more about and probably cheaper than a Channel Island. but all the Channel Islands were 'factory fit' and built to a standard of fit out. well, except for the first 6 but that is another Story!

I would agree the Channel island 22 would do the job, i would prefer the single engine rather than the twins that some have, they seem to fetch a higher price than the seaworkers though, but worth a thought. my idea is to have a nosey around at the end of the season when my boat comes out, then see if i can come across a project that i can buy cheap and use my free labour to make it good again.
 
Top