PhilF
New member
Re: It\'s like computers...
how did the duty work, who was the supplier
<hr width=100% size=1>
how did the duty work, who was the supplier
<hr width=100% size=1>
calling all radar experts
- Thread starter capel679
- Start date
Koeketiene
Well-known member
Re: It\'s like computers...
Westmarine.
Paid 300 for the radar itself - was end of line stock clearance. The 1622 went out of production 2 years ago. Rest was p&p and VAT.
Still great deal - a robust, reliable, easy to use radar for under 500
<hr width=100% size=1>Experience is a good teacher, but she sends in terrific bills.
Westmarine.
Paid 300 for the radar itself - was end of line stock clearance. The 1622 went out of production 2 years ago. Rest was p&p and VAT.
Still great deal - a robust, reliable, easy to use radar for under 500
<hr width=100% size=1>Experience is a good teacher, but she sends in terrific bills.
A
Anonymous
Guest
Re: It\'s like computers...
>>The 1622 went out of production 2 years ago. Rest was p&p and VAT.Still great deal - a robust, reliable, easy to use radar for under 500<<
I installed one in 2000 and used it until I sold the boat this summer. Excellent set, used it for dozens of approaches in thick fog around the SW and Channel Islands. I like if far better than the Ratheon radar of a similar vintage I've 'inherited' on the new boat even though the new one is a far better set spec-wise. The 1622 is/was intuitive, the R80 isn't.
<hr width=100% size=1>
>>The 1622 went out of production 2 years ago. Rest was p&p and VAT.Still great deal - a robust, reliable, easy to use radar for under 500<<
I installed one in 2000 and used it until I sold the boat this summer. Excellent set, used it for dozens of approaches in thick fog around the SW and Channel Islands. I like if far better than the Ratheon radar of a similar vintage I've 'inherited' on the new boat even though the new one is a far better set spec-wise. The 1622 is/was intuitive, the R80 isn't.
<hr width=100% size=1>