stamfordian
New member
Following on to the post of bugs in fuel tanks, i feel i must reply and have a go at the designeers of fuel tanks on larger boats with large capacity tanks.
As a 17 year old apprentice on large industry(b***)can,t spell again )tanks we ALWAYS angled the tank so 10% of capacity was not usable ie the take off was higher than you could not acctually use that amount, adding to this the ulage was drained say once per fortnight ,ie thats 10% of the tanks capacitythis was mostly water .This was on tanks upto 66000 gallons which were in constant use.Sorry depsol/soltron but the problem is not new ,educating designers is,lets say that fuel tanks were fitted to larger crusers to sit at berthing at an angle so that you couln,t use 10% of tank capacity,AND make it a condition of use that ulage is checked
and drained ,after a period of none use...problem solved...no bugs sorry no soltron.This is not a personal dig at additives but a tried and tested method of stopping "the bug"
P.S. i must stop writing this c*** after a night out
As a 17 year old apprentice on large industry(b***)can,t spell again )tanks we ALWAYS angled the tank so 10% of capacity was not usable ie the take off was higher than you could not acctually use that amount, adding to this the ulage was drained say once per fortnight ,ie thats 10% of the tanks capacitythis was mostly water .This was on tanks upto 66000 gallons which were in constant use.Sorry depsol/soltron but the problem is not new ,educating designers is,lets say that fuel tanks were fitted to larger crusers to sit at berthing at an angle so that you couln,t use 10% of tank capacity,AND make it a condition of use that ulage is checked
and drained ,after a period of none use...problem solved...no bugs sorry no soltron.This is not a personal dig at additives but a tried and tested method of stopping "the bug"
P.S. i must stop writing this c*** after a night out