bilbobaggins
N/A
Re: \'Unnecessarily acidic replies\'
My dear JohnBuch, please do not continue to find personal offence where an observation-in-general was offered. You are as welcome here as I am - and probably more so.
You are perfectly entitled to use whatever takes your fancy to attach yourself to your climbing rope - "twice round the deck, once round 'is neck, and up 'is hearse for a stopper" - and argue 'til the cows come home that you know better than everyone else in the room about the merits of X versus Y. That is a time-honoured and gentle pastime, much beloved of football fans, political pundits, anchor enthusiasts and forum lurkers on 'ere.
However, that has little to do with the 'facts, logic and reason' of the topic in question. Should you seriously wish to challenge the work of the climber/engineer/physicists at the NEL who opened a new chapter of safety for those worldwide who work with ropes and cables, then you are at liberty so to do. The way is clear: do your research, publish your paper, and expose your conclusions to peer review. But you'll find the world of eng-academia a good deal more savage and intolerant than the 'ould dossers' on here, with a lot more 'blood on the carpet'.
This is one of the few places on the planet where unsubstantiated opinion gets house room. The price of that is banter.... some of it even gentle.
As for falling off bits of Llanberis countryside in 1968, the ever-perceptive Jimi rightly spotted that as self-deprecation. Although I did finish the lead.....
No-one on 'ere takes me too seriously - not even me! Feel free to extract the urea. Enjoi your day.....
/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
My dear JohnBuch, please do not continue to find personal offence where an observation-in-general was offered. You are as welcome here as I am - and probably more so.
You are perfectly entitled to use whatever takes your fancy to attach yourself to your climbing rope - "twice round the deck, once round 'is neck, and up 'is hearse for a stopper" - and argue 'til the cows come home that you know better than everyone else in the room about the merits of X versus Y. That is a time-honoured and gentle pastime, much beloved of football fans, political pundits, anchor enthusiasts and forum lurkers on 'ere.
However, that has little to do with the 'facts, logic and reason' of the topic in question. Should you seriously wish to challenge the work of the climber/engineer/physicists at the NEL who opened a new chapter of safety for those worldwide who work with ropes and cables, then you are at liberty so to do. The way is clear: do your research, publish your paper, and expose your conclusions to peer review. But you'll find the world of eng-academia a good deal more savage and intolerant than the 'ould dossers' on here, with a lot more 'blood on the carpet'.
This is one of the few places on the planet where unsubstantiated opinion gets house room. The price of that is banter.... some of it even gentle.
As for falling off bits of Llanberis countryside in 1968, the ever-perceptive Jimi rightly spotted that as self-deprecation. Although I did finish the lead.....
No-one on 'ere takes me too seriously - not even me! Feel free to extract the urea. Enjoi your day.....
/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif