Boaters fined

Joined
4 Aug 2008
Messages
203
Location
West Berks
Visit site
Not sure if this has been posted but here goes...........


Boaters ordered to pay £6,587 for flouting registration and other navigation laws

19-Jan-2012
Five boaters caught using their vessels on the River Thames without valid registrations and one with inadequate sanitary appliances have been convicted by magistrates.

As the navigation authority for the River Thames between Cricklade, Wiltshire and Teddington, Middlesex, the Environment Agency monitors all craft that passes through locks where staff are on duty and patrol. Boaters using the waterways need to register and display a valid boat licence and failure to do so will lead to prosecution.

The separate cases were heard at South Western Magistrates’ Court on Monday 16 January, Reading Magistrates Court on Friday 13 January, and Staines Magistrates’ Court on Thursday 12 January. All the registration offences were contrary to non-registration charges under Articles 4 and 18 of The Environment Agency (Inland Waterways) Order 2010.

Paul Phillips of Victoria Mansions, Wilsden, London, was charged after an Environment Agency officer found the defendant’s vessel “Triton” moored against a derelict pontoon on Hurst Park below Garricks Aite without a valid licence. Mr Phillips attended court and pleaded guilty and was fined £35, ordered to pay compensation of £485.86, £60 costs and a £15 victim surcharge by Staines Magistrates’ Court.

In the second case, Richard Biddulph of Main Road, Hursley, Winchester, pleaded guilty by post was fined £160, ordered to pay compensation of £2,114.10, £60 costs and a £15 victim surcharge for not registering his boat ‘De Hoop’ after being caught at Thames Ditton Marina.

At Reading Magistrates’ Court, Nicholas Tsirides of Lytton Road, Oxford, OX4 3PA, was found without a valid licence for his boat ‘Banbury’ whilst downstream of Sonning Bridge in the Reading area. The defendant was found guilty in his absence and fined £200, ordered to pay compensation of £845.64, £85 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

In the final cases at South Western Magistrates Court, Hadrian Smith who lives onboard Nyko and has another boat under the name of ‘TT Nyko’ both of which are moored on the River Thames at St Albans park, Hampton Court Road, attended court and pleaded guilty and was ordered to pay compensation for both vessels of £454.14 and costs for both at £60.

Alistair Trotman of Eden Street, Kingston upon Thames Surrey KT1 1DN attended court and pleaded guilty to two registration charges for two boats - the ‘Hui’ and the ‘Old Kingston Coal’. ‘Hui’ was found moored at Canberry Gardens, Kingston upon Thames without a valid licence. The defendant’s other boat ‘Old Kingston Coal’ was also found without the correct registration after an Environment Agency officer found the vessel moored in trees along Teddington Reach.
Mr Trotman was ordered to pay compensation for both vessels of £1,812.69 and costs for both £60, totalling £1,872.69.

In relation to a separate navigation offence Alanda Thompson of Canonbury Road, London N1 2HS pleaded guilty by post to one charge of keeping or using a boat that had inadequate sanitary appliances that allowed raw sewage to enter the river. This is contrary to Byelaw 66 of the Thames Navigation Licensing and General Byelaws 1993. The defendant’s vessel ‘Manimal’ - underwent a sanitation inspection by an Environment Agency officer whilst it was moored upstream of Teddington Lock. Ms Thompson was fined £35, costs £60 and victim surcharge of £15, totalling £110.

Mick Dutson, an Environment Agency Waterways Enforcement Officer, said:
“Boaters have a responsibility to ensure their vessels are registered and we regularly challenge people using boats on the river without licences. In response to customer feedback, we continue to do routine patrols and lockside checks. In addition we carry out targeted enforcement exercises and this is a direct result of that action.
“It is crucial that boaters also provide adequate sanitary appliances for their boat to ensure that no raw sewage is discharged into the River Thames which can have a detrimental affect on human health and wildlife.

“The income we raise from boat registration is very important for the community and the environment. It contributes directly to improving and maintaining waterway structures such as locks and lay-bys, as well as providing facilities like visitor moorings, water points, rubbish and sewage disposal and electric boat charging hook-ups.

“It is vital that we continue to invest in our waterways to create and maintain a good quality environment that people can enjoy for years to come”.
You cannot use a boat on the non-tidal River Thames without it first being registered with the Environment Agency. This applies to all types of pleasure craft, including motor cruisers, sailing boats, narrow boats and unpowered vessels, such as canoes or rowing boats.

An annual fee is payable upon registration and covers the period 1 January to 31 December. A licence plate is then issued which must be displayed on the vessel. Visiting boats also need to be registered to cover the period of the visit.
Anyone taking up boating should make themselves aware of the rules, regulations and general code of river behaviour. This information can be found in the our publication ‘A user’s guide to the River Thames’ which can be picked up at locks or downloaded from www.visitthames.co.uk.

Checks are carried out at all lock sites and during regular patrols along the River. The Environment Agency regularly prosecutes those who do not pay their way.
ENDS
Notes to editors:
Getting registered is now even easier:
• Customers from previous years can renew their annual registration by credit or debit card by calling our craft registration team on 0118 953 5650.
• If you require an annual registration for the first time, applications can only be made by post. Please request a registration form by calling 0118 953 5650.
• If you plan to visit the River Thames this year then we have three types of visitor registrations available and we offer the option to mix and match to suit your river holiday needs, giving a total of 67 days on the beautiful River Thames.
• Please visit our web site at www.environment-agency.gov.uk/craftregthames for more details and application forms.
The Thames Navigation Licensing and General Byelaws 1993 are made under the Thames Conservancy Act 1932 (section 233).
Ends

All media enquiries: 0118 953 5555
Please ask for the duty press officer
Environment Agency news releases, both national and regional, can be found on its web site: www.environment-agency.gov.uk
 

stuhaynes

New member
Joined
25 Dec 2009
Messages
707
Location
Yorkshire
www.best-camping-stoves.com
"to suit your river holiday needs, giving a total of 67 days on the beautiful River Thames."

**************

Edited: Reason: Very insulting and possibility of prosecution.

Made up my mind though. Stuff London.

In defense of London. Sorry m'lud; I just can't think of one...

Holiday? London? Does not compute.
 

rr_123

Active member
Joined
22 Aug 2007
Messages
1,212
Location
Surrey
Visit site
In relation to a separate navigation offence Alanda Thompson of Canonbury Road, London N1 2HS pleaded guilty by post to one charge of keeping or using a boat that had inadequate sanitary appliances that allowed raw sewage to enter the river. This is contrary to Byelaw 66 of the Thames Navigation Licensing and General Byelaws 1993. The defendant’s vessel ‘Manimal’ - underwent a sanitation inspection by an Environment Agency officer whilst it was moored upstream of Teddington Lock. Ms Thompson was fined £35, costs £60 and victim surcharge of £15, totalling £110.

or about half the price of getting a holding tank fitted. I think that sends out the wrong message...
 

Captain Coochie

Active member
Joined
19 Apr 2003
Messages
13,583
Location
London
Visit site
Seems like its ok to chuck human poo in the river but dont pay your tax and youre for it :rolleyes:
That reminds me i must go down to the boat and stick that orange thingy on it .
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,261
Location
Medway
Visit site
"to suit your river holiday needs, giving a total of 67 days on the beautiful River Thames."

**************

Edited: Reason: Very insulting and possibility of prosecution.

Made up my mind though. Stuff London.

In defense of London. Sorry m'lud; I just can't think of one...

Holiday? London? Does not compute.


My trips up the Thames are always looked forward to and more often that not we have a few additional crew on board to enjoy the experience with us.
The bit from Greenwich up to Chelsea is a must for any boater who actually enjoys his boating,both a bit of a challenge and unforgetable views.
Above Teddington the river provides a vista unrivaled anywhere in the UK and a lot further afield.

"Why, Sir, you find no man, at all intellectual, who is willing to leave London. No, Sir, when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."
— Samuel Johnson

Boswell and Johnson
 
Last edited:

cereal tiller

Member
Joined
15 Apr 2011
Messages
70
Visit site
or about half the price of getting a holding tank fitted. I think that sends out the wrong message...

Agreed.the fine should have been much greater.

not much point in having rules and regulations if the penalties are so paltry that they do not act as a deterrent.
 
Joined
4 Jun 2011
Messages
282
Visit site
Agreed.the fine should have been much greater.

not much point in having rules and regulations if the penalties are so paltry that they do not act as a deterrent.

Agreed also. Shouldn't the fine be a certain 'multiple' of the annual river license fee they were attempting to dodge? If it was say 10 times the license fee, then maybe those who would otherwise be tempted might think twoice about the relative risk. :cool:

Ether that, or hang them by their feet from whicever bridge is nearest their boat! Good medeival community punishment, much better than an ASBO!! :D
 

boatone

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2001
Messages
12,845
Location
Just a few cables from Boulters Lock
www.tmba.org.uk
At least we can see that the EA are actively, and successfully, prosecuting.

I am given to understand that the case re sanitary appliances was a test case prosecution under byelaw 66, which relates to vessels with 'sanitary appliances'. The EA prosecuted the owner of a boat, the toilet of which was capable of discharging into the river, and who refused to allow access to seal it.
This case highlights the issue of overboard discharge of sanitary waste and the lack of pump out facilities. Even the few facilities that exist are frequently out of order. The TMBA will be pressing the agency to address this issue.

The EA are reported to have so far received and processed nearly 20% more private powered registrations than this time last year.
We have sent (and are sending more) reminders to all last year's registered customers who we haven’t heard from, reminding them of the need to register their boat if it’s afloat. We’ll remind them that they risk prosecution and we will be increasing our enforcement patrols. We’d appreciate any assistance you can provide in reminding your contacts that any outstanding Thames registrations are now overdue.

I also understand that nine people are about to undergo warrants training which will enable them to carry out the full range of enforcement activity.

Watch out if you are unregistered and in the Henley stretch:
During December we carried out targeted enforcement activity on the Henley reach on boats unregistered in 2011. We are following this up with a second wave this month against the same boats for 2012 registration offences. This is as part of our action on persistent offenders.
 
Last edited:

miket

Active member
Joined
21 Jun 2001
Messages
2,008
Location
N Hampshire
Visit site
Applaude EA

... for pursuing these cases.
I would be interested to know what proportion of the fines are actually paid in full and how many are allowed to pay over a period of time and then instantly default?
 

boatone

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2001
Messages
12,845
Location
Just a few cables from Boulters Lock
www.tmba.org.uk
I would be interested to know what proportion of the fines are actually paid in full and how many are allowed to pay over a period of time and then instantly default?

As I understand it, the actual cost of enforcement activity including the cost associated with legal proceedings is a direct cost against the EA Thames budget. I have enquiries pending to try and establish the overall order of this and to what degree fines contribute back into the mix.

The cost of pursuing people who may be unable to pay is probably not justified on purely financial terms but will have a serious 'message' effect to assist in ramping up compliance overall.
 

the_wanderer

New member
Joined
8 Apr 2003
Messages
433
Visit site
Need glasses?

"to suit your river holiday needs, giving a total of 67 days on the beautiful River Thames."

**************

Edited: Reason: Very insulting and possibility of prosecution.

Made up my mind though. Stuff London.

In defense of London. Sorry m'lud; I just can't think of one...

Holiday? London? Does not compute.

The Thames encompasses much more than just London. I have navigated from Shoeburyness to Lechlade in one trip and enjoyed every piece of the changing scenery and changing moods of this wonderful river.

The river is clean and well kept, the locks are always tidy and easy to use when unmanned and the keepers are very polite and helpfull, with few exceptions.

Should have gone to Specsavers mate.

Regards.

Alan.
 
Last edited:
Joined
4 Jun 2011
Messages
282
Visit site
As I understand it, the actual cost of enforcement activity including the cost associated with legal proceedings is a direct cost against the EA Thames budget. I have enquiries pending to try and establish the overall order of this and to what degree fines contribute back into the mix.

The cost of pursuing people who may be unable to pay is probably not justified on purely financial terms but will have a serious 'message' effect to assist in ramping up compliance overall.

Surely Plaintiff (EA) legal costs should be awarded against the accused if they are found guilty?...
 

boatone

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2001
Messages
12,845
Location
Just a few cables from Boulters Lock
www.tmba.org.uk
Surely Plaintiff (EA) legal costs should be awarded against the accused if they are found guilty?...
.....but what if they are 'men of straw' and have no money ? Although there will be cases of those who can afford to pay trying to evade doing so, it is likely that many of the persistent non-payment cases will relate to those who cannot pay.
 
Last edited:
Joined
4 Jun 2011
Messages
282
Visit site
.....but what if they are 'men of straw' and have no money ? Although there will be cases of those who can afford to pay trying to evade doing so, it is likely that many of the persistent non-payment cases will relate to those who cannot pay.

Then these people should not be fined, but have their boats seized and disposed of. I understand in some cases (eg Count Duckula) disposal may be at a cost, but this hopefully will be partly offset by those boats that can actually be sold. This is what bailiffs working for debt companies do all the time. Why should the river be any different? May seem harsh, but why should the EA funding gap fall to us honest folk? If the EA are serious about closing this gap, then they need to 'get serious' about license dodgers, mooring fee evaders, mooring over-stayers etc. BRING BACK HANGING! (oops, didn't mean that!). :mad:
 

boatone

Well-known member
Joined
29 Jul 2001
Messages
12,845
Location
Just a few cables from Boulters Lock
www.tmba.org.uk
Then these people should not be fined, but have their boats seized and disposed of. I understand in some cases (eg Count Duckula) disposal may be at a cost, but this hopefully will be partly offset by those boats that can actually be sold... BRING BACK HANGING! (oops, didn't mean that!). :mad:

Ah, a man of the Jeremy Clarkson persuasion ! :D

Your other points are well made and I understand that is the course of action that is being pursued. However, the legal process does take a considerable time and has to be followed before ultimate sanctions can be applied.

With regard to the specific craft you mention I am given to understand that "it's in hand".
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
28,261
Location
Medway
Visit site
Then these people should not be fined, but have their boats seized and disposed of. I understand in some cases (eg Count Duckula) disposal may be at a cost, but this hopefully will be partly offset by those boats that can actually be sold. This is what bailiffs working for debt companies do all the time. Why should the river be any different? May seem harsh, but why should the EA funding gap fall to us honest folk? If the EA are serious about closing this gap, then they need to 'get serious' about license dodgers, mooring fee evaders, mooring over-stayers etc. BRING BACK HANGING! (oops, didn't mean that!). :mad:

Problem could be when the offender in question is perhaps a live-a-board and also a resident of the that area therebye entitiled to living accomodation such as B&B.
Highly unlikely the court would make somebody homeless for a few hundred quid only for it to cost thousands.
 

No Regrets

Active member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,330
Visit site
I'm glad the freeloading scum have been fined :)

Wonderful news. Now I can have a quick dip on a nice hot day, knowing there is a tad less human effluent floating past, notwithstanding the Rats stuff, and thats another few grand in the kitty to help keep another lockie in his job.

Good news indeed :D
 

watson1959

New member
Joined
1 May 2011
Messages
6,329
Location
Reading
Visit site
EA could do a "tell on your neighbour"; a bit like benefit fraud.

You report a boat not displaying current licence (don't forget to take a photo); EA prosecute and on successful result you get a "reward" fee of (say) £40.

Could make a fair wedge doing this ;)


What a cracking idea.....not only would this help off-set the running costs of law-abiding river users, but it would also provide a far more grown-up version of I-Spy which my 19yr old would love!!

Never has being a grass been so much fun.......and lucrative:D
 

watson1959

New member
Joined
1 May 2011
Messages
6,329
Location
Reading
Visit site
"to suit your river holiday needs, giving a total of 67 days on the beautiful River Thames."

**************

Edited: Reason: Very insulting and possibility of prosecution.

Made up my mind though. Stuff London.

In defense of London. Sorry m'lud; I just can't think of one...

Holiday? London? Does not compute.


Hi Stu
As a Northerner I can say I completely and utterly agree with you.

London is as diabolical, desolate a place to spend time as the Yorkshire Dales or coast......

Hmmmm....methinks you're also here for some mischief:cool:
 

Other threads that may be of interest

Top