Boat Sharing schemes - finding one or setting up my own.

ontheplane

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 Mar 2004
Messages
2,098
Location
Bristol UK
Visit site
Hi there,

I am considering setting up a boat share for the 2011 season (long way off but this could need some planning).

I know the obvious problems (fighting over use time, arguments over boat being left clean / unclean etc etc) I am keen to hear from anyone who's done it as to the problems that come up that they DIDN'T expect / Couldn't have forseen (obvious problems welcome too).

I have looked at some of the schemes on the market to join one of them but none seem to hit the spot for what I want.

Some seem to have the problem that they have too many people in the group (have seen up to 12 - so just 4 weeks use over a whole year and as the season's only 6 months long in this country really only 2 wks / weekends - useless) or the cost of entry is really high so it's not a proper "budget" boating option. Also many seem very expensive for what they offer (I saw one for £499 per month that you'd get 13 days use - that seems too dear to me).

Have also looked at Seawake - which looks interesting (unlimited access - really?? For £195 pm - what if you were retired and just booked all the time), but allocation is on a first-come basis, so I can see you'd need to sit at your keyboard at 00:00:01am to book that Saturday on the Bank Holiday six months in the future.....

So I am considering doing my own and offering it how I would want it.
I am looking to have 4 members (possibly add a fifth if they were retired and only wanted mid-week use not in school hols for example at a reduced cost) and have the boat in a South Coast Marina either in the water or possible dry stack / Park & Launch for perhaps 7 or 8 months (Start April -> end Oct / Nov?) All members to have a PB2 qual as minimum + VHF certificate.

We'd put in around £12k each plus a £1000 damage deposit each (Which the detail of how that would be taken would need careful working out.

We'd look to buy a older small boat (currently looking at Sealine S23 with diesel at around £25k around the 1999 mark) and see if I could get an engine warranty (can you do that with older boat engines)?

I've chosen that boat as it seems to offer a lot of boat for the money, big enough to sleep 4 (at a push) but small enough to keep costs down - other candidates would be considered, but there seems a good choice of these boats at that price and the one I've already looked at was in excellent condition - Also there aren't many diesel boats at that size, and I think for a boat that will get used a lot, diesel is important.

So let's assume we had £48k in the pot - we buy the boat for £25k and I'm allowing £5k to kit her out to suitable spec - DSC-VHF, a decent plotter, liferaft, flares, small aux outboard, etc etc (hopefully it would have a lot of this already)

so we now have £18k in the pot. If we say insurance will be £700 pa, Berth will be £3000 pa and servicing and maintainence will be £800pa then annual cost will be £4500

We'd expect the members to give the boat a quick clean when they'd used it and to leave it as they found it, but with 4 users I suspect we'd need a professional clean once a month at say £100 per time (hopefully cheaper but I don't know).

So assuming we say it would cost £5300 per year to run the boat, we could have 3 seasons use with the money we had in the pot - I'm guesstimating here, but I doubt I am too far out. I don't want a scheme where people pay monthly, too much risk of one or more members just not paying their "subscription" and me left "Holding the baby" in terms of the bills etc. If people didn't have the money in cash, personal loans go well over £12k and I doubt anyone looking at this sort of thing would need to borrow more than about half the cost. Then if they defaulted on their loans, it wouldn't affect the other members, as it would be a personal debt.

At the end of a pre-agreed time (I'm thinking 3 years) the members have a vote as to which of the following they wish to do:-

1) Put the boat on the market - when she sells, the proceeds are divvied up equally. I would hope that after 3 years, the boat will only have dropped a few thousand - perhaps we'd get £20k - £24k for her if we buy at the right price and with the full kit we'd have on her - which would mean each member getting £5000 - £6000 back. All in, the whole 3 years will have cost a total of £6000 - £7000 or around a couple of thousand a year which is less than just the mooring cost if you owned it yourself.

Or

2) Keep the boat for a further year - in which case people just pay up £1500 each which should cover it. This would again be such a cheap way to own and run a boat.

At the end of that year the same vote as to what to do is had and so on perhaps up to a maximum of six years when the boat has to be sold no matter what.

Of course once the boat is sold, anyone of the group who wanted to, could leave their money in the pot, top it up and we'd get a newer boat and so on.

Anyone wanting "out" can sell their share privately, as long as the incoming member is approved by the existing members (personalities will be important in this) and they can sell it for whatever they can get - if for example the incoming "buyer" saw he'd get £4500 back and there was still a year to go, I'm sure you could sell it for £5500 - £6000. We could also put in that after the first full year, if more than 2 members want out and can't sell their share, then the boat is put up for sale and once sold, the proceeds are divvied up.

So that's the theory, I am sure the practice isn't that simple.....

Would the boat have to be MCA coded - or as it would be effectively owned by a company with "shareholders" and the company didn't rent it out for profit would it not be classed as a commercial vessel? (In reality, purely for safety sake we'd probably have to do a lot of the coding requirements anyhow)?

Does anyone on here think they would buy into something like this, where you'd certainly get one weekend in 4 on the boat, but if someone couldn't use it one week, I am sure there would be chances to swap weekends, or even buy extra weekends from the other members!

As I mentioned at the start, the key would be how the time was divvied up, and how the use of the boat was policed in terms of any damage done etc. but do the forum think it could work??
 
I did this with a (3 partners) phantom 42, years ago. It was very successful. Search for old posts on it

Boat does not have to be coded, definitely

What makes this work is finding 3 or 4 NICE PEOPLE. I fear you have legislated far too many rules and might think the solution to problems is to write a rule about it. It isn't. You'd be better just agreeing some basic rules and then finding people you can trust. I shared with 2 incredibly nice and honest guys and we never had a disagreement or quoted the legal agreement. We just got on with it, and any situation was dealt with just by people being naturally fair

I dont like the idea of all the cash tied up in your proposal. I'd just get people to top up the kitty every few months or so, not prepay into a 3-year pot

I think 3 partners is better than 4. At 4, people become detached from the project. Also beware folks who are strretching financially. If engine busts and needs £1000 you don't want a partner who cant afford his £333. That's a disaster. Likewise if one person says "I'll fix it" and then makes it worse. Ask the questions outright about how rich they are. Nothing rude about that. And just becuase they would be "personal loans" dont think creditors could not take the boat share. That's a myth. They could take the boat share (not the whole boat)
 
Last edited:
Thanks

I think in reality, I'd have the rules in the background, but as you say, always try and just agree things between the parties.

I only have so many "rules" so if there was a dispute, there would be something set out about how to deal with it...

I see what you are saying about having the money tied up, but what would happen if one of the 4 stopped paying in? How would you restrict access to the boat or make them pay - I really wouldn't want to have to take people to court, and what if they'd lost their job or something and actually couldn't pay?

It's worth thinking about though -

Thanks for your comments
 
I think one of the problems might be the three year commitment. This isnt a very large boat, and many people will find they want a different style of boat or size of boat within three years. So, even if all else goes well, I think you are looking at a change in members. Possible, but an upheaval I suspect.
I would agree with JFM, though. This is a hobby and to be fun. You are setting too many rules. I would say, pay for the boat upfront, pay costs a few months in advance, agree how to "value" the boat, and if anyone wants out, thats his share. The remaining people decide what to do at that time.
Still, my concern is that its too long with too many people in too small a boat. Someone will want change within the three years.
 
Hmm very good point.

I suppose for me it's a good size, but as you say, for many it may be too small plus they might decide they want their own as they like it so much.

So how should I seek out "nice" people to be in the group - I know the forum's a decent start, but any other ideas? I could do a website, but I actually don't want it to appear too "commercial" - it's not to make money but to save money...
 
I think 4 owners is too many in the UK for another reason. If the weather doesn't play ball for just one of your allocated weeks/weekends, then it could be two months between trips to the boat. Then when the sun does shine, and the wind drops, you'll be itching to get out on the boat, but someone else will be on it
 
I see what you are saying about having the money tied up, but what would happen if one of the 4 stopped paying in? How would you restrict access to the boat or make them pay - I really wouldn't want to have to take people to court, and what if they'd lost their job or something and actually couldn't pay?

Honestly, what you're saying wont work. The way to de-risk this aspect is to find people who aren't financially stretched to begin with. Sure, there will always be some risk, just as there is in crossing the road, but the way to minimise the risk is to look both ways and find the right partners, not impose all these rules

Suppose people paid up front and there was this £18k kitty. Who would have cheque signing authority? Everyone? You only? 3 out of 4? What?

If it's not everyone, are you happy that your cash can be controlled by others? If everyone must sign, then everyone has a veto, so the hypothetical person in financial difficulty will STILL not spend the money on the boat, and he'll be able to hold you to ransom over your cash that's now stuck in the kitty.

You can only have a kitty if you're quite clear about signing authority, and if your "rules" on signing authority don't mean you've gone from frying pan to fire. In my Phantom 42 partnership, any one partner could sign the syndicate bank account, but each person was naturally nice enough to check with the others if any unusual or non trivial payment was about to be made. And we never had much money tied up in there anyhow. Max £10k between the 3 of us
 
I'm on the point of buying a boat that has had a 3 way ownership over the last 10 years. The guys are good friends still as far as i can see. They have had a lot of work done over the time - but because it befalls to the main man, he has ended up with the responsibility for arranging any work etc. Also, the yards doing the work have taken advantage of the situation, knowing the bills have a 3 way split and the problems of agreement and, shall we say, have been somewhat robust in their charging. This can be I reckon one of the main problem areas.
Having said that, a lot of boat partnerships last longer than their marriages!!
 
agree with NickH, even worse,
I couldn't imagine that I had to split the usage of my boat with three others,
We use her quite some time (150hr's /season) but still for me the season is too short.
What will happen on a nice day in summer when you all three have a perfect day to use the boat ?
Or the day's that you've booked have horrible weather ?

If you're happy with only 1/4 of the ownership or usage of the boat, I think you better rent one :confused:

For me I am very glad that I'm the sole owner of the boat, I like to invite friends to join us on our trips, some of them offer to pay a part of the fuel bill, I usually refuse, and just accept that they pay for dinner :)

then for the diving trips, the buddy's pay a share of the fuel bill,
but far from enough to cover the total cost, but at least a very tiny bit of the cost is covered, but more important, I have found some pleasant way's of using my preferred hobby.
 
Top