jac
Well-known member
But did he have a warrant for the flag and a matching burgee? And was it the third Tuesday of a month with no r's in it? I think we should be told.
He would have had an admiralty commission.
But did he have a warrant for the flag and a matching burgee? And was it the third Tuesday of a month with no r's in it? I think we should be told.
To you perhaps, but then your responses on this thread have been completely uninformative.I'm afraid you do sound rather boring.
At Trafalgar Nelson was Vice-Admiral of the White and flew a white ensign on Victory.
On previous ships he had different ranks and flew different flags. For example, at the Battle of the Nile his flagship flew a white ensign but a blue flag at the mizzen because he was a rear admiral of the blue.
You did ask, and all of these flags have meaning, but it may be too difficult for you to comprehend why it was or is important. If you don't understand it who cares? What does it matter?
Of course it is. Have you never been to Cowes Week and seen all of the different house flags?That is fascinating, so it's OK to fly two different flags? That opens up a world of possibilities that I'd not previously considered - talk to me eBay, what have you got - time to buy a red perhaps? I just can't countenance a white, it seems wrong somehow, perhaps I have a vestige of flag morality after all?
You calling Nelson a froggie? Yes I know it's a painting but I couldn't find a contemporaneous photo.
View attachment 60072
That is fascinating, so it's OK to fly two different flags? That opens up a world of possibilities that I'd not previously considered - talk to me eBay, what have you got - time to buy a red perhaps? I just can't countenance a white, it seems wrong somehow, perhaps I have a vestige of flag morality after all?
At Trafalgar Nelson was Vice-Admiral of the White and flew a white ensign on Victory.
On previous ships he had different ranks and flew different flags. For example, at the Battle of the Nile his flagship flew a white ensign but a blue flag at the mizzen because he was a rear admiral of the blue.
You did ask, and all of these flags have meaning, but it may be too difficult for you to comprehend why it was or is important. If you don't understand it who cares? What does it matter?
It may not matter, but it's fascinating and intriguing in equal measure.
The history, freedoms and benefits of open trade owe so much to the British navy and we are all indebted to them for this. I would personally show the deepest of respect to the military folk who help(ed) make all of tnis possible, but to the wearers of ensigns on the basis of some royal warrant - well I was born to a differnt class.
But I digress, your illumination and detail is enchanting :encouragement:
I don't think that anyone with a blue ensign does expect any respect ( at least no more than you would give any other random person you met) This seems to be some totally imagined issue.
To me, all that a blue ( or defaced red) signifies is that you are the member of a particular club. It doesn't make you better or worse ( or even different) to anyone else.
the issue that I have though is someone who hasn't paid to be in that club, then pretending to be in it. Whether that's wearing an MCC tie, claiming to be a military veteran or flying an ensign other than the red.
Incidentally. if you're interested in the impact of Navies on free trade then have a look at the trilogy of books by Peter Padfield - "Naval Supremacy and the opening of the Western Mind" being the most memorable. He may labour the point a little but a fascinating read and a fairly compelling argument IMHO.
If you waltzed into a hospital, claimed to be a top gynaecologist and started taking pictures or womens undercarriage you would very soon be arrested.
At the moment the phrase that comes to mind regarding this thread is,
"Don't feed trolls".
if it wasn't for the good Doctor W...
But if you were an actual top gynaecologist that would be OK?
Truly the thread gives and gives, now the analogy is that flying a blue ensign is equated to gross deception and sexual perversion. Which leaves me with a terrible quandary, when I periodically fly the blue flag will other boating folk think to themselves "there goes a top gynaecologist" or are they more likely to think "pah, another one of those fake gynaecologists" hurriedly cross their legs and tack away from my plastic tub.
Why not? if it wasn't for the good Doctor W do you think you would have harvested anything like 330 posts or over 2000 reads, it has been the 'yachting' thread of the year by a mile without ever descending anywhere near turgidity you get in the lounge where the real trolls live.
I for one am looking forward to a few giggles yet.
No the analogy is that by flying a flag that you're not entitled to fly is equated to deception.
You do have a point there, it seems reasonable that clubs should be allowed to control who flies their flag.
I'm happy for them to fly their made up flags, where they are happy to see my big purple one swinging in the wind.
You do have a point there, it seems reasonable that clubs should be allowed to control who flies their flag.
I'm happy for them to fly their made up flags, where they are happy to see my big purple one swinging in the wind.