Anodes. Anyone familiar with Navalloy anodes ?

About Time

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 Sep 2014
Messages
215
Location
Denmark
Visit site
I have always used zinc for my sterndrives (VP DPG) - I am boating in saltwater and have always had the understanding that I should go for zinc anodes. However after 6 months in the water the zincs are 80-90% gone!!! .... I have recently read about the Navalloy anodes. More expensive but an alloy, zinc and indium blend that should last 30% longer...

The company is Performance metals (US based) ... they have two very interesting articles online.

http://www.performancemetals.com/anodes/navalloy.shtml
http://www.performancemetals.com/anodes/AnodeFAQs.shtml

Would anyone recommend this change from zinc ?

I guess one reason for the short life could be that I stay connected to shore power all the time. I have a friend who toldme that .... I may consider trying a year not doing that - even I feel it is nice always to come to the boat knowing all batteries are fully charged and ready to go :-)

What do you guys do ?
 
A galvanic isolator has been fitted. One follow up question. The O-ring zinc around the driveshaft is always eroding the most while the zinc bar on the transom erode slowly. Guess it takes more to protect the drive leg than the transom due to weight or surface. Would it be a good idea to ground the drive leg to the transom so the transom bar zinc could 'help' the O-ring zinc ? I guess Volvos DPS drives are wired up so transom and leg is grounded together.
 
The galvanic isolator should reduce the rate of loss of material from anodes on structures which are boded to the shorepower earth caused by the "stray" currents conducted by the earth connection.

Either zinc or aluminium anodes can be used in salt water. Aluminium can also be used in brackish water where zinc is not suitable.

Aluminium anodes are made of an alloy which crucially contains a small quantity of indium. Navalloy is simply a brand name for aluminium anodes from Performance Metals.
Zinc anodes are made from a grade of zinc with a very low iron content and a small quantity of cadmium

On a weight for weight basis, taking into account the relative atomic masses of the two metals and the fact that zinc is divalent whereas aluminium is trivalent it is possible to show that aluminium should last theoretically about 3.6 times as long as zinc. However aluminium is much less dense than zinc meaning that aluminium anodes are much lighter than zinc anodes of the same size. Once this is taken into account you find that you should get about 1.4 times as much life from an aluminium as you would from a zinc anode of the same physical size.
You can see from the electrode potentials quoted that aluminium anodes are slightly more reactive than zinc anodes. This probably reduces the "advantage" of aluminium anodes further with the result that they can be expected to last for about 1.3 times as long as zinc anodes.

To complete the comparison you should also take into account the difference in cost, but that's a calculations for the accountants.

You should check the earth bonding of the drive leg and transom but not add any other than that which the manufacturer provides.

The external anodes offer no protection to the engines. The salt water part of the engine cooling system may be protected by internal anodes. If so these should be inspected as part of the routine engine servicing and replaced when necessary.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot VicS. I will try out aluminium anodes and check earth bonding on the drive legs and transoms. With the galvanic isolator added on top hopefully I will see improvements next year.
 
Top