timmygobang
Well-Known Member
I've just got a survey done on a boat, and would welcome opinions on what was reported. I shall speak to the surveyor tomorrow but thought I'd throw this open to the forum, to see if anyone else had similar findings on their surveys. The boat was lifted out for the inspection. The suggestion is to remove sample sections around the boat to inspect the gel coat as part of the condition of sale, or I just go ahead and slap some sealant and AF it and close my eys 
It appears that various different layers of epoxy paint have been applied to the hull, which have varying degrees of adhesion. Several small sections of the outer layers were removed from the hull when it was pressure washed. When sample sections of the antifouling paint were removed, at least the outer layer came away with the paint, but this may be a primer.
Where the areas of paint were removed, the meter registered between 17 and 24. Where the section of epoxy paint was removed on the starboard quarter, a reading of 12 was registered on the gel coat. This suggests that the higher levels of moisture are trapped within the layers of epoxy paint, which is not unusual, but it would be necessary to remove further areas of the epoxy paint to confirm this.
It appears that various different layers of epoxy paint have been applied to the hull, which have varying degrees of adhesion. Several small sections of the outer layers were removed from the hull when it was pressure washed. When sample sections of the antifouling paint were removed, at least the outer layer came away with the paint, but this may be a primer.
Where the areas of paint were removed, the meter registered between 17 and 24. Where the section of epoxy paint was removed on the starboard quarter, a reading of 12 was registered on the gel coat. This suggests that the higher levels of moisture are trapped within the layers of epoxy paint, which is not unusual, but it would be necessary to remove further areas of the epoxy paint to confirm this.