AIS transponder. Now you need it?

NPMR

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2006
Messages
2,280
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
Talking to a pal the other day, he was telling me about a visit to a Coastguard Office on some sort of 'official' visit - a PR day for the Coastguards, I think. Might have been Falmouth but at the most, Brixham - ho doesn't tend to travel very far.

One of the comments he made, was that he got the impression that the AIS 'screen' was the most used and that radar was little looked at - which is why the coastguard feel they can monitor stuff from a distance as they have "all the information".

I also spoke to a ferry captain (on the bridge of his ship) in October, and they use AIS to see what the other ships are doing as it's "easier" than the radar.

So, if we want to be seen, are we going to have to buy a transponder especially if we are going through any kind of shipping in our boats? Small planes do as a matter of course, and have done so for a long time.

I'm beginning to think we'll have to get one, even if it's not in the budget!
 

Flossdog

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
592
Location
West Wales
Visit site
I've been thinking along those lines too. But, and it is a big but, yachties would have to be conscientious and NOT transmit when in, for example, the Solent on a bank holiday! Can you imagine what it would be like on the screen? You would not see the chart for all the AIS boxes. It is bad enough in Milford Haven sometimes.
 

PhillM

Well-known member
Joined
15 Nov 2010
Messages
3,990
Location
Solent
Visit site
Won't it be the case that if everyone uses a class B, then shipping will simply filter it out? I recall reading an article of a collision and the ship had filtered out "clutter" which included class B AIS transponders.
 

Blue5

New member
Joined
16 Mar 2006
Messages
2,182
Location
Hampshire and Portugal
Visit site
Talking to a pal the other day, he was telling me about a visit to a Coastguard Office on some sort of 'official' visit - a PR day for the Coastguards, I think. Might have been Falmouth but at the most, Brixham - ho doesn't tend to travel very far.

One of the comments he made, was that he got the impression that the AIS 'screen' was the most used and that radar was little looked at - which is why the coastguard feel they can monitor stuff from a distance as they have "all the information".

I also spoke to a ferry captain (on the bridge of his ship) in October, and they use AIS to see what the other ships are doing as it's "easier" than the radar.

So, if we want to be seen, are we going to have to buy a transponder especially if we are going through any kind of shipping in our boats? Small planes do as a matter of course, and have done so for a long time.

I'm beginning to think we'll have to get one, even if it's not in the budget!

Brilliant bit of kit, helps reduce workload so no bad thing.
 

[32511]

...
Joined
18 Oct 2008
Messages
11,735
Visit site
I may be wrong, but I believe tha at presentt light aircraft are only required to have transponders in controlled airspace. Anyone confirm this? Interestingly, controlled airspace is being extended to windfarm locations.
 

fireball

New member
Joined
15 Nov 2004
Messages
19,453
Visit site
Talking to a pal the other day, he was telling me about a visit to a Coastguard Office on some sort of 'official' visit - a PR day for the Coastguards, I think. Might have been Falmouth but at the most, Brixham - ho doesn't tend to travel very far.

One of the comments he made, was that he got the impression that the AIS 'screen' was the most used and that radar was little looked at - which is why the coastguard feel they can monitor stuff from a distance as they have "all the information".

I also spoke to a ferry captain (on the bridge of his ship) in October, and they use AIS to see what the other ships are doing as it's "easier" than the radar.

So, if we want to be seen, are we going to have to buy a transponder especially if we are going through any kind of shipping in our boats? Small planes do as a matter of course, and have done so for a long time.

I'm beginning to think we'll have to get one, even if it's not in the budget!

Do we really need the coastguard to sit there watching our every move?
I can understand the desire for big ships to be able to see us - so, if you were to venture into busy shipping channels on a frequent basis then I could understand the desire to get a transponder. However ...
the majority of ships still use Radar - and CG can still use Radar too ..

Best to go on the basis that the ship hasn't seen me and it's your duty to avoid it - stand on by all means - but not to the last minute...
 

Ex-SolentBoy

New member
Joined
25 Nov 2006
Messages
4,294
Visit site
I've been thinking along those lines too. But, and it is a big but, yachties would have to be conscientious and NOT transmit when in, for example, the Solent on a bank holiday! Can you imagine what it would be like on the screen? You would not see the chart for all the AIS boxes. It is bad enough in Milford Haven sometimes.

I think there are several solutions to that.

We don't have to have data boxes. Someone can work out an icon that takes less space and can be interrogated for more details.

The screen will only be cluttered if you zoom out. Easy enough to provide a facility to switch on and off AIS targets for large scale viewing.

This is just something the plotter software designers need to sort out.
 

BrianH

Active member
Joined
31 Jan 2008
Messages
4,683
Location
Switzerland
www.brianhenry.byethost18.com
Won't it be the case that if everyone uses a class B, then shipping will simply filter it out? I recall reading an article of a collision and the ship had filtered out "clutter" which included class B AIS transponders.
The Furuno 2117 radar display that many commercial ships use to display the AIS targets has an AIS filter function menu - note function 4.

Furuno_2117_radar_screen_courtesy_SetSail1.jpg


Hopefully, after clearing the Solent or other crowded leisure boat areas someone remembers to turn the filter 'OFF'
 

Skysail

Well-known member
Joined
30 Sep 2004
Messages
1,174
Location
Victoria BC
Visit site
I went to a conference on AIS B filtering recently. The attendance included ferry captains, pilots, leisure yachtsmen and harbour authorities.

The consensus was that AIS, while undoubtedly of value, is not the perfect answer. It is a victim of its own success and many people do not understand its limitations. Many ship installations are minimal. A Channel ferry captain said he never used it, preferring radar, and a pilot said the extra clutter overlaid on a radar screen (in the Solent) meant it was rarely used. Some ships filter out yachts in crowded situations. Add the increasing volume of leisure users, sea kayakers, fishing boats, dive boats (and divers!) and the situation will need a lot of clarification.

more here:

http://www.panbo.com/archives/2010/12/class_b_ais_filtering_the_word_from_dr_norris.html
 
Last edited:

PhillM

Well-known member
Joined
15 Nov 2010
Messages
3,990
Location
Solent
Visit site
Makes me think that AIS could be more of use for looking out / keeping outo f the way of large ships, than relying on them to see us and keep clear. Perhaps a recieved is all that we need?
 

westernman

Well-known member
Joined
23 Sep 2008
Messages
13,714
Location
Costa Brava
www.devalk.nl
If you are less than 10m long or are making less than 1knot over ground, then it looks like you are pretty sure to be filtered out anyway......

Kind of defeats the point.
 

pvb

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
45,603
Location
UK East Coast
Visit site
Any owner of a smallish boat who thinks buying an AIS transponder will ensure he's seen by shipping is impossibly optimistic.
 

Goldie

Well-known member
Joined
29 Sep 2001
Messages
2,181
Location
Nr Falmouth, Cornwall.
Visit site
I may be wrong, but I believe that at present, light aircraft are only required to have transponders in controlled airspace. Anyone confirm this? Interestingly, controlled airspace is being extended to windfarm locations.

Not just light aircraft. There are categories of airspace where it's not even a requirement to have radio, let alone a transponder.
 

fireball

New member
Joined
15 Nov 2004
Messages
19,453
Visit site
Perhaps a recieved is all that we need?

Given the current limitations - I believe a receiver is all we need. That and our own radar and a reasonable reflector - a seame may be more advisable if you're out playing in poor vis a lot ...

I think that perhaps dayglow orange sails might be a better answer ...
 

maxi77

Active member
Joined
11 Nov 2007
Messages
6,084
Location
Kingdom of Fife
Visit site
Talking to a pal the other day, he was telling me about a visit to a Coastguard Office on some sort of 'official' visit - a PR day for the Coastguards, I think. Might have been Falmouth but at the most, Brixham - ho doesn't tend to travel very far.

One of the comments he made, was that he got the impression that the AIS 'screen' was the most used and that radar was little looked at - which is why the coastguard feel they can monitor stuff from a distance as they have "all the information".

I also spoke to a ferry captain (on the bridge of his ship) in October, and they use AIS to see what the other ships are doing as it's "easier" than the radar.

So, if we want to be seen, are we going to have to buy a transponder especially if we are going through any kind of shipping in our boats? Small planes do as a matter of course, and have done so for a long time.

I'm beginning to think we'll have to get one, even if it's not in the budget!

I think you will find they will still have to have radar on display and being observed, and if they hit anything and do not have radar on and observed then the master will lose his ticket.

A long time ago I used to be involved in selling marine equipment, and we sold a radar which 'saw through' rain clutter using circular polarisation, but to be able to use it you had to have a normal polarised antenna back to back with your CP antenna. This way you had one sweep CP and saw most contacts in the rain, and then a normal sweep with rain clutter but perhaps some other contacts as well.
 
Top