I wonder if the state chipping in half a mill is a good idea. If it's not a successful business, why is it worth so much? If it *is* a successful business why can't they borrow the money?
It’s a ’social business’. Not everything has to be obsessed with shareholder profit.
If a business does not make a profit, it’s not going to be a business for long.It’s a ’social business’. Not everything has to be obsessed with shareholder profit.
If a business does not make a profit, it’s not going to be a business for long.
So as a ‘social business’, who pays the bills?
Not what I asked.
That's a lot of boodle for a pub in the middle of nowhere.
Particularly when it is going to that arrogant Belgian who ruined the ambience of the place. I wonder how they decided his valuation was acceptable.
Particularly when it is going to that arrogant Belgian who ruined the ambience of the place. I wonder how they decided his valuation was acceptable.
. I wonder how they decided his valuation was acceptable.
The Nationality of the current owner is irrelevant.
The Nationality of the current owner is irrelevant. Its up for sale, the community has an opportunity to buy it. Whether public funds should be used for this sort of thing strikes at the heart of the issue: owners that have destroyed communities through lack of investment. Maybe government land grabs and asset repatriations at a loss tot he owner is better solution, or maybe not.
Irrelevant, but strangely controversial. I've heard Dutch, Belgian and German and heated debates about which is correct.
Think you'll find the nationality of all the locals....
Is not local.
Ink