INEOS AC 2-0

anoccasionalyachtsman

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2015
Messages
4,173
Visit site
The ACE (event organisers) wanted to postpone it. Ineos wanted to postpone it. ETNZ wanted to postpone it. The NZ people wanted to postpone it.

LRPP objected to postponing it, simply (in my view) because they felt that they were on a roll, and clearly don't care about anyone or anything other than winning. Very selfish behaviour which will come back to bite them.
I'm not convinced that ACE (or TNZ) really did. As I implied, a lot of people will be contractually obliged to be elsewhere as of the 25th, and an awful lot more who want/need to be. Who does it really benefit to extend it? Auckland is only under Level 2 restriction - all the private spectator boats are as free to go out as we here were last summer, the village could operate with 'distancing'. Far fewer on the grass, and on the ferries admittedly, but that's hardly the population of NZ. Makes no difference to most watching on screens.

Are you sure that it's not your (and my, and completely forgivable) bias towards Ineos that wouldn't like to give them a few more days practising and tuning?

According to a local, there's no wind due in Auckland tomorrow. Suppose that high stays for a few days? LR win. That would happen anyway, regattas aren't postponed for weather. (Cowes Week a few years ago).
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,051
Visit site
Hope you enjoy it. Regrettably the gloss of the event has gone for me. I have the utmost respect for Flaming
and the other serious racers. Unfortunately the content of their posts totally misses Kukri's point about doing
the decent thing and making a good example for the sport, and more importantly young people. Being a professional racing yachtsmen must be great for some but to be a pawn in someone else's game like this for the money does not appeal.

I feel for the LR sailors on Saturday but it would be nice if just one of them walks away. I don't expect I will be the only one after this naïve flutter of interest in the AC now returns to the real world of sailing.
Little confused as to where you think I disagree with Kukri? I don't really.

Reality is that LR have the rules (that everyone signed up to) on their side. ACE have very ham-fistedly tried to publicly shame them into a delay, but all they could ever do really was ask.

My personal opinion is that LR are misguided at best to refuse from a PR point of view, but that the statement from ACE throwing them under the bus is absolutely outrageous. Unlike pretty much all other professional sport, the timing of the races plays a big factor in the outcome due to the weather and the available tuning time. Absolutely fine for the organisers to suggest a change due to circumstances, that's their role, but for the event organisers to then publicly criticise one team for refusing to change the rules that all the teams signed up to half way through the event is, just wow...

Don't forget that there is a large cost to extending on the team who wins. If they push back the date of the Prada cup, and push back the date of the Americas Cup to match, then the team that goes through to the cup suddenly has to rejig all their planned logistics, from extending crew and base staff contracts, to extending crew and staff accommodation, maybe having to extend the lease on their shore compound, potentially rearranging transport logistics to get their boat and kit home, rearranging dates for key sponsors and guests to come and watch the racing (further complicated by quarantine etc).

Nobody is coming out of this looking good, but ACE come out the worst to me.
 

halcyon

Well-known member
Joined
20 Apr 2002
Messages
10,767
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
Little confused as to where you think I disagree with Kukri? I don't really.

Reality is that LR have the rules (that everyone signed up to) on their side. ACE have very ham-fistedly tried to publicly shame them into a delay, but all they could ever do really was ask.

My personal opinion is that LR are misguided at best to refuse from a PR point of view, but that the statement from ACE throwing them under the bus is absolutely outrageous. Unlike pretty much all other professional sport, the timing of the races plays a big factor in the outcome due to the weather and the available tuning time. Absolutely fine for the organisers to suggest a change due to circumstances, that's their role, but for the event organisers to then publicly criticise one team for refusing to change the rules that all the teams signed up to half way through the event is, just wow...

Don't forget that there is a large cost to extending on the team who wins. If they push back the date of the Prada cup, and push back the date of the Americas Cup to match, then the team that goes through to the cup suddenly has to rejig all their planned logistics, from extending crew and base staff contracts, to extending crew and staff accommodation, maybe having to extend the lease on their shore compound, potentially rearranging transport logistics to get their boat and kit home, rearranging dates for key sponsors and guests to come and watch the racing (further complicated by quarantine etc).

Nobody is coming out of this looking good, but ACE come out the worst to me.

End of the day, who if LR win the AC will remember who said what ?

Has Merc gone back to making F1 cars ? we seem to be going back to where we were before their involvement in the boat.

Brian
 

flaming

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2004
Messages
15,051
Visit site
End of the day, who if LR win the AC will remember who said what ?

Has Merc gone back to making F1 cars ? we seem to be going back to where we were before their involvement in the boat.

Brian
I somewhat suspect that INEOS hasn't gone backwards, but LR have gone further forwards.
 

TernVI

Well-known member
Joined
8 Jul 2020
Messages
5,070
Visit site
The ACE (event organisers) wanted to postpone it. Ineos wanted to postpone it. ETNZ wanted to postpone it. The NZ people wanted to postpone it.

LRPP objected to postponing it, simply (in my view) because they felt that they were on a roll, and clearly don't care about anyone or anything other than winning. Very selfish behaviour which will come back to bite them.
The Italians are winning it fair and square according to the rules and NoR which they entered into.
It is entirely normal for a Regatta to have an end date.
You cannot re-write the NoR halfway through just because there's TV money to be made, without the consent of all parties.
 

Bobc

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
9,945
Visit site
The Italians are winning it fair and square according to the rules and NoR which they entered into.
It is entirely normal for a Regatta to have an end date.
You cannot re-write the NoR halfway through just because there's TV money to be made, without the consent of all parties.
They are indeed. They're just not winning many friends along the way.
 

Bobc

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
9,945
Visit site
Better today. The second race showed what they could do if they didn't lose the start.

Hats off the LRPP in the first start. How they managed to slow the boat down like that was incredible. Ben must have thought that he had them until then.

Tomorrow is going to be interesting.
 

Buck Turgidson

Well-known member
Joined
10 Apr 2012
Messages
3,170
Location
Zürich
Visit site
Better today. The second race showed what they could do if they didn't lose the start.

Hats off the LRPP in the first start. How they managed to slow the boat down like that was incredible. Ben must have thought that he had them until then.

Tomorrow is going to be interesting.
Still trying to understand why the start wasn't recalled as both boats were over early!

Forecast is light winds tonight so it could be all over by the morning.
 

Bobc

Well-known member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
9,945
Visit site
Still trying to understand why the start wasn't recalled as both boats were over early!

Yes. They said that they both got penalties so they cancelled each other out. I guess it was only because they went through the line at the same time. Only guessing though.

I would have thought that the race would have been binned and re-started, which to my mind would have been fairer, as LRPP were only over because they went up early to shut Ineos out. If they had gone for the line on time, they would have been a couple of boat lengths further down the line, giving Ineos more room.

I wonder what would have happened if Ineos had bailed out at the last minute and not made the line, but LRPP crossing early? Surely then they would have had to recall?
 

bedouin

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
32,323
Visit site
Do they do recalls in this regatta - they might just declare it a penalty and require one boat to drop 50m behind the other as they did of the INEOS penalty.
 

geoid96

Active member
Joined
19 Nov 2007
Messages
1,136
Location
51°50.100’N 001°46.020’E
Visit site
Do they do recalls in this regatta - they might just declare it a penalty and require one boat to drop 50m behind the other as they did of the INEOS penalty.
From the RRSAC:
44.2 Penalties
(a) OCS Penalties
Penalty for yachts that are OCS:
(i) after her starting signal and while inside the boundary, the penalized yacht
shall act immediately to reduce her VMG / VMC until she is 50 metres behind
the other yacht, or
(ii) the penalized yacht shall start as per definition start (a).

I read this to mean that the OCS yacht can either drop 50m behind other yacht or return and restart. I guess in almost all circumstances the first option will be the least disadvantageous.
 

ithet

Well-known member
Joined
27 Mar 2009
Messages
1,406
Location
UK, Hamble
Visit site
Seems that Ineos having shown they can only win if they get the start, the starts are going to be even more tactical. With LR now needing to win just 2 they can afford to take risks and be even more aggressive pre-start.
 

anoccasionalyachtsman

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2015
Messages
4,173
Visit site
Seems that Ineos having shown they can only win if they get the start, the starts are going to be even more tactical. With LR now needing to win just 2 they can afford to take risks and be even more aggressive pre-start.
To be fair, race 6 showed that LR can only win if they get the start. Unless it gets shifty that's how it's going to be.
 
Top