REMINDER - COVID-19
Any content, information, or advice found on social media platforms and the wider Internet, including forums such as YBW, should NOT be acted upon unless checked against a reliable, authoritative source, and re-checked, particularly where personal health and liberty is at stake. Seek professional advice/confirmation before acting on such at all times.
Users who are found to promulgate FAKE NEWS on the forum in regard to this issue, intentional or otherwise, may find their access terminated. It is your responsibility to provide references to bona fide sources.
FAKE NEWS, in this regard, is that which is posited by organisations, media, etc., that is repeated on the forum, or used to support personal opinion/hypothesis posted by users - FAKE NEWS is not necessarily the personal opinion/hypothesis being posted in itself, any issues with such should be challenged respectfully.
IN ADDITION it seems that conspiracy theories are finding their way onto the forum. This is not the place for such content. Users who post it may find their access limited or permanently suspended. Please leave it where you find it.
I second the book recommendation.Hi Juan,
I've just been through the process myself to try and quantify the "improvements" I made to our hull. In it's simplest form, you separate frictional resistance and form or wave making resistance and calculate them separately.
For frictional resistance you will have to calculate the submerged surface area of your hull and appendages and factor in the correct Reynold's number for a particular speed.
Form resistance is invariably based on displacement.
I highly recommend "Principles of Yacht Design" by Larsson/Eliasson to help with this. The book also includes, in some detail, the necessary formulas, graphs with the appropriate Reynold's numbers and an overview of other types of resistance.
There is also a much simpler method that uses the frontal projection of a hull in sqm, multiplied by the speed in m/sec x a factor of 0.4 I have found this to be far too inaccurate an approach, in my case, by about by 20%.
You are right when it comes to absolutely precise predictive data for unusual design features, but the Delft series provides sufficiently accurate information for your average, garden variety of prospective performance evaluation. Furthermore, there has been plenty of data feedback from full scale craft to corroborate the Delft model.It’s a very complex issue as it will depend on a whole range of factors - including the heel angle, leeway angle, waves, hull form and appendages. Whilst the skin friction is relatively simple to predict (albeit with a lot of assumptions) the other components of drag are far more complex. There is a reason why naval architects still spend a lot of money on tank testing scale models!
You can use the Delft Series as explained in Principles of Yacht Design for an estimate, but depending on your hull the answers may be out by a good margin.
If you want to know to a higher level of accuracy, contact one of the Universities with a tank (Southampton, Solent, Strathclyde, Newcastle) and ask about the daily rate for testing. You would need to supply a suitable model (they may be able to assist with CNC cutting the model) and you would need at least a full day in the tank for basic data. You’d be looking at a couple of £k minimum for the data but at least you would know for certain!